Answer:
a) About 12%
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to find the interest rate required to achieve her goal, so we will need to use the interest-compound formula:
Where:
PV= Present Value
i= interest rate
FV= Future Value
n= number of periods
replacing the data provided:
solving for i:
first, divide both sides by 50.000 to simplify the equation:
Take 
roots of both sides:
±![\sqrt[10]{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B10%5D%7B3%7D)
solve for i:
±![\sqrt[10]{3} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B10%5D%7B3%7D%20-1)
We get two answers, but we look for a coherent value. So we take the positive one:
≈12
Answer:
G = (9.4, 9,4)
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio is applied in the x-distance and the y-distance. The ratio is 2:3 so you have to divide the distances by 5 and 2/5 correspond to FG and 3/5 to GH
x-distance:
x2 - x1 = 16 - 5 = 11
11/5 = 2.2
y-distance:
y2 - y1 = 13 - 7 = 6
6/5 = 1.2
Point G = Point F + (2.2*2, 1.2*2)
Point G = (5, 7) + (4.4, 2.4)
= (9.4, 9.4)
Answer:
Since angle G is
✔ the largest
angle, the opposite side, JH, is
✔ the longest side
.
The order of the side lengths from longest to shortest is
✔ HJ, GH, and GJ
.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Only Elijah's model is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The data given in the question tells us they have 12 games left on their soccer team. Each one of them tried to simulate the fact by creating some model which look like a balance between quantities.
Elijah placed 3 cubes of value 1 and a cube of value x on one side of a balance. On the other side, he placed 15 cubes of value 1. He was obviously modeling the fact that 15 cubes (games due to play in our case) should be equal to 3 cubes (games already played) plus the x numbers left to play
This model if perfect, since the only way to equilibrate the balance is setting x to 12, the games left to play
Jonathan used a table with 3 x's in a row and a 15 in the second row, trying to model the same situation. To our interpretation, this table doesn't show the number of games left to play. If we equate 3x = 15, we get x=5 which has nothing to do with the situation explained in the question, so this model is not correct.
Consider the function f ( x ) = 2479 ⋅ 0.9948x First compare this with f ( x ) po ( 1 + r ) ^ 2 We get po = 2479 And 1 + r = 0.9948 = 1 – 0.0052 r = -0.0052 < 0 Therefore, f is an exponential decay function with a decay rate of 0.0052 x 100 = 0.52%
