Answer:
The answer is: C) The scientific method may not reveal a "true" model of the world.
Explanation:
When economists and scientists use the scientific method they are trying to develop models of the world and then test them with data. Past data is used to try to predict future economic behavior. That doesn´t mean that those models are 100% accurate and true, but rather that they might (or not) apply to specific situations.
Microeconomics relies on the use of the scientific method and econometrics, while the scientific method is not applicable in macroeconomics.
On the off chance that an American organization has a solid female nearness at that point there might be troubles because of the limitation puts on ladies in Saudi culture. Additionally, the Saudi predisposition against what they see as modest work could cause issues if an American organization does not comprehend it. Since American organizations have a tendency to advance construct more in light of experience it could cause issues that the Saudi depend more on family and individual associations
Answer: 2,200 units.
Explanation:
The complete exercise is:
A manufacturer shipped units of a certain product to two locations. The equation above shows the total shipping cost T, in dollars, for shipping c units to the closer location and shipping f units to the farther location. If the total shipping cost was $47,000 and 3,000 units were shipped to the farther location, how many units were shipped to the closer location?
Given the following equation:
You know that "T" is the total shipping cost (in dollars), "c" is the number of units shipped to the closer location and "f" is the number of units shipped to the farther location.
Based on the information given in the exercise, you can identify that, in this case:
Then, knowing those values, you need to substitute them into the given equation:
And finally, you must solve for "c" in order to calculate the number of units that were shipped to the closer location.
You get that this is:
Answer:
A. $117 million
B.13%
C. $21.75
Explanation:
B. Calculation to determine How large a loss in dollar terms will existing FARO shareholders experience on the announcement date
Expected Loss= 390*30%
Expected Loss= $117 millions
Therefore How large a loss in dollar terms will existing FARO shareholders experience on the announcement date will be $117 millions
B. Calculation to determine What percentage of the value of FARO’s existing equity prior to the announcement is this expected gain or loss
First step is to calculate the Existing Shares Value
Existing Shares Value =36*$25
Existing Shares Value= $900 millions
Now let calculate the Expected Loss %
Expected Loss % = $ 117/$ 900
Expected Loss % = 13%
Therefore the percentage of the value of FARO’s existing equity prior to the announcement is this expected gain or loss will be 13%
C. Calculation to determine At what price should FARO expect its existing shares to sell immediately after the announcement
Price Per Share: $ 25*(1 - 0.13)
Price Per Share$25*0.87
Price Per Share: $21.75
Therefore what price should FARO expect its existing shares to sell immediately after the announcement is $21.75
Answer:
Brain didn't act ethically and didn't follow IMA's principles of ethical conduct.
IMA's 4 principles are:
- Competence: this refers to basically acting and performing in a professional manner. Brian didn't act professionally since he intentionally miscalculated the price of lumber in order to get the lowest possible cost.
- Confidentiality: refers to keeping information to yourself, i.e. do not tell outsiders about the specifics of your job. This principle was not an issue here.
- Integrity: refers to avoiding conflicts of interests. Obviously Brian didn't follow this principle since he is taking advantage of the company's policy and acting unfairly.
- Credibility: refers to information and all the respective analysis being correct and true. Since Brian is deliberately cheating on the company, he is not using the correct information on purpose and is lying.
