The intolerable acts were one of the biggest causes of the American Revolution, if they had not been passed there is a good chance America would not have revolted against the British, or at least would not have done it when they did. Colonial times specifically would most likely not have had the turmoil of the Revolutionary War and all that went with it.
Answer: Right parietal cortex
Explanation: The human cerebral cortex is composed of four major lobes, each charged with different sensory information processing task. The occipital lobe handles visual information processing, the frontal love is charged with making cognitive decisions and judgment, the temporal live handle auditory information processes while the PARIETAL LOBE is charged with interpretation and processing of touch or feel. The right parietal lobe according to Corbetta and colleagues is most responsive in attention shift scenario.
C, A, A, C, hope this helps
Answer:
Answer:
Moral Realism with objective responsibility
Explanation
Piaget explained moral development in children the different stages:
- The first stage (0-5 years old) is called pre-moral. Within this stage, children require external control for their moral actions.
- The second stage (6 to 10 years old) is called Moral Realism with objective responsibility. Here, although are seen as absolute and actions are judged by its outcomes. For instance, a child is instructed not to pass a red light. The action of breaking the rule is reprehensible because it can cause an accident or getting a ticket.
- Finally, the third stage (more than 11 years old ) is called Moral relativism. In this stage, the child is able to judge the actions based on the intentions of the actor and the context in which these actions happens. For instance, in this stage, children began to comprehend white lies.
The Type II error would be to conclude that EnerG is no more nutritious than Supreme when Energy actually provides more health benefits.
Option b
<u>Explanation:</u>
Type II error sometimes referred to as beta error is a term in statistics that doesn’t reject the false-null hypothesis. It occurs when one refuses to reject the false null hypothesis. In this type of error, the false findings are accepted as true.
It also confirms two different scenarios as similar even though they are different. It can be reduced by adjusting the criteria of the null hypothesis by increasing tolerance with caution to ensure that the error type doesn’t end up being Type I error.
