Answer:
As the decrease in the tulip's quantity in the both cases is the same, hence the opportunity cost will also be the same required that the marginal cost remains constant.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the value lost in opting to alternative option. This means that if an ice cream costs me $10 then the opportunity cost of eating an ice cream would be $10 because I haven't enjoyed an alternative of an ice cream which would be worth $10. Likewise, if I am deciding to attend a party but I have previously purchased cinema tickets worth $50 then the opportunity cost of attending the party would be $50 and opportunity cost of watching movie would be the loss of entertainment at the party.
The opportunity cost of producing 0-300 tulips is $5 per tulip then it is more likely that the cost of producing 600-900 tulips will also be $5 per tulip.
Thus the opportunity cost here for each case will be:
Case1 0-300 Tulips: 300 Tulips * $5 per Unit = $1500
Case2 600-900 Tulips: 300 Tulips * $5 per Unit = $1500
But if the cost of producing first 300 units of tulips are different from the third 300 units of tulip then there will be of course a difference in opportunity cost.
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
The answer to this question Vicarious conditioning
Vicarious conditioning refers to the learning process of a certain belief or value not from directly experiencing a certain stimulus but through other people experiencing that stimulus.
In this particular case, lily will see that her brother receive some pocket money for cleaning the garage and lily will be automatically be interested to do the same in hope for getting the reward
The correct answer is - This research would be eligible for exemption because the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting. This type of research does not need IRB (IRB being institutional review board also known as ethics committee) review because the researcher will not be interacting with the children in anyway, it is purely observational and the setting is a public place, in addition all children will remain anonymous in the study, therefore the researcher is not breaking any code of ethics.
ADHD or the Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is
treated by therapy, medication and a special diet or some combination of the
three or all of them combined. Usually the most common way to treat ADHD is with
the behavioral therapy coupled with social training, special school curriculum
and physical exercise. So, this is the treatment that would most likely be given.
The use of medication and a special diet can also be prescribed.
