I believe the answer is Two women who formed the National Woman Suffrage Association.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Hello. Unfortunately you did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
It is only possible to answer this question if the text it refers to is read. In this text, you should look for the moment that shows the incident at the mosque and analyze why the way Adnan behaved in that incident was so disturbing and uncomfortable for the people present at the place. This behavior should be linked to the motives that led Adnan to be accused of murder, where you will see if his behavior is related to the charge, making it easier to show that Adnan is guilty of the charges he receives.
 
        
             
        
        
        
"Both chemical weapons and machine guns helped to create a stalemate on the Western Front" is the statement best compares the use of chemical weapons and machine guns in World War I
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In April 1915, Germany was  the first use of a chemical weapon like chlorine gas, diphosgene, mustard gas at Ypres, Belgium against French. Later in 1917, French also started to use chemical weapons.
In 1925, due to  overuse of chemicals weapons, The Geneva Protocol treaty prohibited the use of biological or  chemical weapons in international armed conflicts.
Machine Gun also dominant during the first world war.They wiped down many enemy troops. machine guns was not a lethal weapon during Great War.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
the more powerful person.
Explanation:
A person who interrupts during a conversation is perceived to be <u>the more powerful person</u>. In a conversation it is regarded to be wrong for a less powerful individual to interrupt the conversation. for example, when an employee is discussing with his/her employer, there is the tendency for the employer to interrupt to make or seek corrections because he is the more powerful person in that situation and the action will not be regarded as disrespectful. On the other hand, when an employee interrupts his employer, that action may be regarded as rude. Generally, an individual who interrupts a conversation is the stronger one.