Answer:
True
Explanation:
According to the books of Daniel, during an extravagant banquet, King Belshazzar saw a divine handwritten message ( mene, mene, tekel, upharsin ) that appeared on the plaster wall of the palace after Belshazzar desecrated the temple vessels taken from Jerusalem by his father. The written words found on the wall were translated by prophet Daniel to mean that his kingdom had been numbered, weighed, and divided ( daniel 5:25-28). The prophet Daniel analysis and interprets the written words for king Belshazzar as God's judgment on the king MENE: God has numbered the days of his kingdom and brought it to an end
TEKEL: You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting
PERES: your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.
It came to pass that very night that his kingdom was taken by the Medes and Persians.
Answer:
b. Persuasive tactics are more impersonal today than they were many years ago.
Explanation:
In the past, not many people aware of marketing tricks that can manipulate their emotion to persuade them to buy a certain products. After such marketing tricks become more commonly known by the public, the effect wouldn't be as effective as it used to.
Because of this, many businesses start to adopt an impersonal tactics to win over their consumers. Rather than try manipulating their customers' emotion, they start to persuade them using scientific facts or researchers that convince the customers that the product would be beneficial for them.
Answer:
Grandmother hypothesis
Explanation:
The grandmother hypothesis is the result of a further developed mother hypothesis. The mother hypothesis suggests that the energy required to keep a woman fertile is better used in order to ensure that her offspring reproduce.
The grandmother hypothesis suggests that the grandmothers bolster the efforts of the mothers and make sure that their grandchildren's genetic interests are met. The grandmothers' can also increase the grandchild's social circle further increasing their chance to mate.
This question would best help the reader understand Du Bois's separation from the NAACP:
How were Du Bois's views different from those of the NAACP?
