Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the Taylor series of sinc(x) we will use the taylor series of sin(x). We have that

which is the taylor series expansion based at 0. Then for
, by dividing both sidex by x, we have that

which is the taylor series expansion for the sinc function. Since the series of sine converges for every value of x. Then the taylor series of sinc converges for every value of x, but 0.
So, we would need to remember, the one way that me personally would view square rooting would be by simplifying them, and that number would go into that number that many times. So, when doing this kind of problem, we are not truly going to do this, but we are just going to simplify it, and to see what other square "rooter" would go into that.
So, we would need to remember a (key) point, <em>we aren't just multiplying, for the most part, we're simplifying. </em>
Our result:
![\boxed{\boxed{\bf{2a^2b \sqrt[4]{24a^2b^3} }}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cboxed%7B%5Cboxed%7B%5Cbf%7B2a%5E2b%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B24a%5E2b%5E3%7D%20%7D%7D%7D)
We didn't just multiplied it, we also simplified it also.
Answer:
<u>The correct answer is A. 16.5%</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Let's review the information given to us to answer the question correctly and to calculate the trend:
2006 2007 Trend
Top Coats 297 223 -24.92%
Parkas 210 210 + 0%
Jackets 213 285 +33.80%
Raincoats 137 259 +89.05
Trench coats 103 127 +23.30%
Total 960 1,104 +15%
2. If the trend shown in these graphs stays constant, what percent of the market will parkas occupy in 2008?
Let's calculate the percent of the market occupied by parkas.
In 2006 = 210/960 = 21.88%
In 2007 = 210/1,104 = 19.02%
In 2008 = 210/1,270 = 16.54% (210 + 0 = 210; 1,104 + 15% = 1,270)
<u>The correct answer is A. 16.5%</u>
The width is half the length, so is
width = (1/2)*length
width = (1/2)*(<span>3.2a + 0.18b) cm
width = (1.6a +0.09b) cm
The perimeter of the rectangle is twice the sum of length and width.
perimeter = 2*(length + width)
perimeter = 2*((3.2a +0.18b) cm + (1.6a +0.09b) cm)
perimeter = 2*(4.8a +0.27b) cm)
perimeter = (9.6a +0.54b) cm
Sasha did not get this answer, so apparently ...
her reasoning was not correct.</span>