A dealer in British pounds who thinks that the pound is about to depreciate may want to lower both his bid price and his ask price.
<u>Option: A</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The value of the bid corresponds to the top rate a customer pays for a safe. The value which is asked refers to the cheapest rate, which got agreed by a supplier for a service.The variance among these two costs is referred to as range; the narrower the range is, the growing the liquidity of the protection provided.
The average consumer is contending with the bid and asking dissemination as an implied exchange cost. For an instance, if security A's current price quotation is $20.40/$20.45, shareholder X, who is looking into buying A at the current market value, would charge $20.45, whereas shareholder Y, who wants to sell A at the current market value, would receive $20.40.
The answer is option "<span>d. conduct research and development activities in developing countries".
</span>
MNE stands for a multinational enterprise, which refers to an organization that has a globally deal with business sectors, creation as well as tasks in a few nations. Famous MNEs incorporate fast-food organizations or companies are McDonald's (MCD), (YUM), Starbucks Coffee Company (SBUX), Microsoft (MSFT), and so on. Other mechanical MNEs incorporate vehicle producers, for example, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors (GMC).
Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.
* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.
Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false
Answer:
$420,000
Explanation:
Calculation for Orleans’s net U.S. tax liability
Using this formula
Tax liability=Taxable income×U.S tax rate
Let plug in the formula
Tax liability=$2,000,000×21%
Tax liability=$420,000
Therefore Orleans’s net U.S. tax will be $420,000. The withholding tax amount of $8,000 was not included because it was already imposed on the dividend.
Answer:
The total value created is $70
Explanation:
In this scenario, the total value created is the total monetary benefit of a consumer and a producer with respect to the sale of a product. It therefore, is the sum of the consumer surplus and producer surplus. It is calculated as follows:
Consumer surplus = consumer's willing price - market price = 130 - 100 = $30
Producer surplus = market price - producer's willing price = 100 - 60 = $40
Therefore, total value created = 40 + 30 = $70
