The phenomenon is a manifestation of diffusion of responsibility. The diffusion of responsibility is when there is a presence of others and there are consequences or events that has occured, a person involved or present around the area would likely take responsibility. It is a way of a person would think that other people around the area would be the one to take the responsibility or help the people involved or in need that the person who thinks that way won't likely want to be involved.
Answer:
price
Explanation:
It will be easy to provide an example to better illustrate this. Lets suppose that a patient has been diagnosed with cancer and is trying to figure which between chemotherapy or taking drugs is the best treatment. The question this cancer patient is going to ask herself is which among the two will prolong her life. Thus, survival time is the response variable. In our case, the price is the response variable because it is the determining factor of where these college students will live. Amenities somehow affect the price and thus, it will act as the response variable. Price is what we are able to measure and the location which is the students' primary interest lies in our response variable
Answer:
Accept H0
Explanation:
A group of psychologists was interested in knowing whether living environment had any effect on a student's grade point average (GPA). They took a set of twins and randomly assigned one sibling of the twins to live in an urban area and the other to live in a rural area After one year, they computed the GPAs for the twins and looked at the differences. Then they calculated the test statistic, and the P-value was found to be between 0.20 and 0.25. With a 0.05 level of significance, we should <u>accept</u> H0, and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that a difference exists between the mean GPAs of the two living environments.
A p value that is less than or equal to 0.05 suggest strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so you reject the null hypothesis. A p-value greater than 0.05 indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so you accept the null hypothesis. In this study, the null hypothesis will be "living environment has no effect on a student's grade point average (GPA)", and since the p value obtained from the study is greater than 0.05, we accept the null hypothesis.
The individual is likely to be suffering from a dissociative
disorder. It is because an individual who has this disorder is likely to have
dissociative amnesia in which there is a temporary loss of memories or recall
because the individual is likely involve of having his or her memory to be
disrupted or breakdown.
Answer:
He thinks that hitting people and that violence is okay.
Explanation:
Children get taught everything at a young age so that they don't forget because it "sticks to them better" so they try to do their best and teach them what's proper at a young age. Wong in this case; was taught that hitting is okay and he also wants to release his anger. Since parents are role models for kids, he thinks that what he's doing is correct.
