Answer:
Passive Communication
Explanation:
Communication is the deliverance of a message, thought or feeling through speak, writing, behavior or any other form. There are three types of communication that exists and these are:
- Aggressive communication: This is a confrontational approach and the persons involved are often left uncomfortable. It is often hostile and leaves out the other parties to make any decision for themselves. This person will defend their rights at the cost of others. In some cases there is some effective here but it must be used as a last resort.
- Passive communication: This is an uncomfortable position for the person that should be communicating and is not. These people will ignore their rights on the basis of not causing a fuss and will suffer a lot of emotional trauma in the mean time. More likely than not the issues is not resolved and the person could only leave the situation for a change. This is the least effective form of communication but the most peaceful for the other party.
- Assertive communication: This is the more logical approach that involves mature expression of feelings, demand of rights and considerations for the other parties' thoughts, rights and feelings. This is the most desired way to handle a situation but it is not always effective. The take away from this is that one's dignity and self respect is left in tact and the message was sent across without discomfort or aggression.
In this case the UAP that suffers in silence is exhibiting Passive Communication.
Answer:
Federalists; Antifederalists
Explanation:
The New Constitution faced a problem regarding its <em>ratification.</em> Many were divided, primarily into "Federalists" and "Antifederalists." Federalists wanted a<u> strong government,</u> thus <u>they supported the New Constitution.</u> On the contrary, the Antifederalists supported a system that was <u>decentralized</u> thus, they were<u> against the ratification.</u>
The Federalists involved the<em> property owners, creditors and merchants</em> while the Antifederalists involved the<em> small farmers, frontiersmen, debtors and shopkeepers. </em>
The Federalists wanted the <em>rich or elite people to take control of the society.</em> They also wanted lesser democracy while the Antifederalists thought that the<em> elite's power was dangerous.</em>
Thus, this explains the answers.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Power dynamic of Virtuous Friendship best describes their relationship.
Explanation:
Power dynamics is the interaction of people or a group of people with each other in which one party has more power over the other party. This power could outright people of the other party. Power is the ability to influence other to control the other people behavior.
Now in this example, both friends are practicing virtuous friendship; which shows that both friends are selfless and are completely alright with the choice of the other friend, which describes the bonding of both friends is so firm that they value the decisions of each other a lot and will accept it what other friend will do.
Answer:
Civil Service protections are in place to minimize political considerations in the job-related process and to ensure government employees are recruited, hired, and promoted based on job qualifications and merit and demoted or dismissed only for cause.
Explanation:
Extraordinary job security is every civil servant’s most cherished perk. New federal hires who survive a three-year probationary period are automatically elevated to “career-appointment” status, the civil-service equivalent of academic tenure. Career appointees cannot be fired without “good cause,” such as gross incompetence, habitual tardiness, or on-the-job beer guzzling.
Since civil servants are considered to “own” their jobs, they are entitled to due process before their property can be seized.
The answer is all-or-nothing thinking. <span>This is regularly includes utilizing outright terms, for example, never or ever. This sort of defective reasoning can likewise incorporate a powerlessness to see the choices in a circumstance or answers for an issue. For individuals with tension or melancholy, this regularly implies just observing the drawback to any given circumstance. Individuals who succumb to win or bust reasoning trust that they're either effective or a total disappointment throughout everyday life.</span>