Answer:
d. There is a 98% chance that the true proportion of customers who click on ads on their smartphones is between 0.56 and 0.62.
Step-by-step explanation:
Confidence interval:
x% confidence
Of a sample
Between a and b.
Interpretation: We are x% sure(or there is a x% probability/chance) that the population mean is between a and b.
In this question:
I suppose(due to the options) there was a small typing mistake, and we have a 98% confidence interval between 0.56 and 0.62.
Interpreation: We are 98% sure, or there is a 98% chance, that the true population proportion of customers who click on ads on their smartphones is between 0.56 and 0.62. Option d.
Answer:
The correct answer is $81.28
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find this, we simply treat the word of as a multiplication symbol.
0.8% of 125% of $8128
Now change the percentages to decimals
0.008 * 1.25 * 8128 = 81.28
Answer:
72 yrs old.
Step-by-step explanation:
The combined age
D+O=96
The owner is 3 times older than dog
O=3D
D+3D=96
4D = 96
D= 24
Now substitute the value of D in O=3D
O=3.24= 72
The owner is 72 years old.
Answer:
25
Step-by-step explanation:
The Empirical Rule states that, for a normally distributed random variable:
68% of the measures are within 1 standard deviation of the mean.
95% of the measures are within 2 standard deviation of the mean.
99.7% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.
In this problem, we have that:
Mean = 175cm
Standard deviation = 6 cm
Percentage of students below 163 cm
163 = 175 - 2*6
So 163 is two standard deviations below the mean.
By the Empirical rule, 95% of the heights are within 2 standard deviations of the mean. The other 100-95 = 5% are more than 2 standard deviations of the mean. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, 2.5% of them are more than 2 standard deviations below the mean(so below 163cm) and 2.5% are more than two standard deviations above the mean.
2.5% of the students have heights less than 163cm.
Out of 1000
0.025*1000 = 25
25 is the answer
Answer: 
, 
, 
and 
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, x represents the number of hours Zoe spent running on her wheel and y represents the number of hours spent scratching her cage.
Julie was awoke for at least an hour running on her exercise wheel and scratching the of her cage.
⇒
She ran on her wheel at least twice as long as she scratched at the corners of her cage.
⇒
Also, She spent more than 1/4 hour running on her wheel.
⇒
And, we know that number of hours can not be negative.
⇒
Therefore, the complete system of inequality which shows the given situation is,
, and ,
Note: the feasible region ( covered by the given system) is shown in the below graph.
