Answer:
The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are

Step-by-step explanation:
If we perform a hypothesis test, we can reject or not reject the null hypothesis.
To conclude that the tires have a decreased stopping distance (μ<215), we should state the null hypothesis
and then go on with the analysis to reject it (or not).
If the null hypothesis is rejected, the claim of the manufacturer is rigth.
The alternative hypothesis would be
, that would turn rigth if the null hypothesis is rejected.
W^2=80
W SQRT80
W=8.94 ANS.FOR THE WIDTH
L=3*8.94=26.83 ANS.FOR THE LENGTH
PROOF:
240=8.94*26.83
240=240
Start with $30.25.
Subtract $14.00 to isolate the amount of money spent on admission.
30.25-14.00= 16.25. As a group $16.25 was spent on admission.
Admission is 3.25 per person. Divide 16.25 by 3.25.
16.25/3.25=5.
5 friends went ice skating.
<span>Take the
(original price - new price)/original price
then multiply by 100
If it is a positive number, it is a decrease.
If it is a negative number, it is an increase.
original price: $63.00
new price: $56.07
11% decrease
</span><span>original price: $12.25
new price: $13.23
</span><span>8% increase
</span>
<span>original price: $98.00
new price: $108.78
</span>11% increase
<span>original price: $37.50
new price: $34.50
8% decrease</span>