Complete Question
The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
The correct answer is option c
Explanation:
Faraday states that when there is a change in magnetic field of a coil of a wire, it means that there exist an emf in the circuit which in induced due to the change in the magnetic flux
From the question two separate but nearby coils are mounted along the axis. First coil is connected to the power supply and the current flow is controlled by the supply.When the current alternates, it would produce magnetic field ,also the second coil is connected to an ammeter which indicates the current that is flowing in it when current in the first coil changes
This magnetic field that is produce would cause a change flux which would induce current in the second coil so the ammeter would indicate current flow in the second coil
a is incorrect because the current in fir coil is not change hence flux won't change therefore current is is not induced in second coil
This is the same reason b is incorrect
d is incorrect due to the fact that when the second coil is connected to a power supply by rewiring it to be in series with first coil the law of electromagnetism would no longer hold so he ammeter would show no reading
Answer:
230
Explanation:
= Rotational speed = 3600 rad/s
I = Moment of inertia = 6 kgm²
m = Mass of flywheel = 1500 kg
v = Velocity = 15 m/s
The kinetic energy of flywheel is given by
Energy used in one acceleration
Number of accelerations would be given by
So the number of complete accelerations is 230
Answer:
The mass of Neptunium is 237.054 u.
Explanation:
Given that,
Mass of Americium = 241.05682 u
Mass of alpha particle = 4.00260 u
The equation is,
Let the mass of Neptunium is m.
Since the mass remain same.
We need to calculate the mass of Neptunium
Using formula of mass
Mass of Neptunium = Mass of Americium -Mass of alpha particle
Put the value into the formula
Hence, The mass of Neptunium is 237.054 u.
Answer:
a)Δy = 81.7mm
b)Δy = 32.7cm
Explanation:
To calculate the distance between any point of the interference pattern, simply use the trigonometric ratio of the tangent:
where D is the separation between the slits and the screen where the interference pattern is observed.
a) In this case:
Δy = |y1max (λ1) − y1max (λ2)|
Δy =
Δy =
Δy =
Δy =
Δy = 81.7mm
The separation between these maxima is 81.7 mm
b)
Δy = |y₂max (λ1) − y₂max (λ2)|
Δy =
Δy =
Δy = 32.7cm
The separation between the maximum interference of the 2nd order (2nd maximum) of the pattern produced by the laser 1 and the minimum of the 2nd order (3rd minimum) of the pattern produced by the laser 2 is 32.7 cm.