Two <em>possible answers</em> are:
23.65 and 23.72.
Explanation:
For the first number, 23.65, we are rounding to the tenths place. 23.65 itself is smaller than 23.7. Looking behind the tenths place, the digit behind it is 5. This means we round the tenths place up; this becomes 23.7.
23.72 is larger than 23.7. We will round it to the tenths place as well. Looking behind the tenths place, we have a 2; this means we "round down." This means leave the 7 as it is and drop the other digits behind it. This gives us 23.7.
The conversion factor should be multiplied in Step 2 instead of being divided.
There is many ways to do this but i did it this way.
180-123.75= 56.25
56.25/5=11.25
=11.25
Answer:
The confidence interval for the difference in proportions is

No. As the 95% CI include both negative and positive values, no proportion is significantly different from the other to conclude there is a difference between them.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to construct a confidence interval for the difference of proportions.
The difference in the sample proportions is:

The estimated standard error is:

The z-value for a 95% confidence interval is z=1.96.
Then, the lower and upper bounds are:

The confidence interval for the difference in proportions is

<em>Can it be concluded that there is a difference in the proportion of drivers who wear a seat belt at all times based on age group?</em>
No. It can not be concluded that there is a difference in the proportion of drivers who wear a seat belt at all times based on age group, as the confidence interval include both positive and negative values.
This means that we are not confident that the actual difference of proportions is positive or negative. No proportion is significantly different from the other to conclude there is a difference.