Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": monopoly.
Explanation:
A monopoly exists when one business is the sole or almost sole supplier of a good or service within a market. This potentially allows the business to become dominant enough to prohibit rivals from entering the marketplace resulting in minimal consumer choice, higher prices, and reduced response to customer requests.
Answer:
Gore is not required to make any accounting adjustments
Explanation:
Gore won't be required to make any accounting adjustments because the litigation loss is already $2,000,000 leading to him recording a liability in his account in which
$5 million in legitimate warranty claims were as well filed by his customers which is why he won't be making any further Accounting adjustment in 2021.
Answer:
Option A is correct
Explanation:
The 2 Option are:
<em>i. The firm Delta Insurers typically affirms claims within 120 days after it receives proof of loss statements
</em>
<em>ii. The firm Delta Insurers typically denies claims within 120 days after it receives proof of loss statements.</em>
<em />
Delta insurance company is a typical insurance company that operates it business in line with the Insurance practice code in its operation country. Failure of perform those duties strictly will lead to revoke of operational license which will incur consequential loss for the Insurance Company.
Delta Insurers insures against peril of Vehicle, Fire, Burglary, Consequential loss, Business Interruption and so on.
The insurer however have its own mode of settling claims as stated in the Policy form. The statement might be stated in there that "<em>we typically affirms claims within 120 days after we receives proof of loss statements". </em>No insurer can states in its policy form that "<em>we typically affirms claims within 120 days after it receives proof of loss statements", t</em>his is against the code of conduct of Insurance business
<em />
The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.
The sender i.e. Geroge who not even know the receiver that sells the homeopathy remedies online so this could raise a few issues but it is not to be considered very serious for red-flagged:
- Since e-commerce arises each and every time that lies between non-known parties online.
This is due to the dirt chape that could make it suspicious also they don't know each other so this should be considered red-flagged.
- The instructions with regard to the payment do not represent any signal of reliability and truthfulness so might me the receiver is trustworthy and genuine.
- In the case when the homeopathy remedies do not have the licensing and permissions so it would become questionable.
No one could suggest the specific brand of homeopathy as it becomes nonprofessional and non-appropriate, so the last option is not be considered.
Therefore we can conclude that The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.
Learn more about homeopathy here: brainly.com/question/7460064
