Answer:
A
Explanation:
When we have more students that enjoy studying history than enjoy studying math and science needed to get a degree in Chemical engineering , this will lead to a large no of history graduates in the labor market making the availability of chemical engineers graduate to be fewer and the demand for it higher.
This in effect cause a higher income for the chemical engineers as they become more of a scarce resources compared to history despite the students spending the same number of years to graduate in the college.
Many companies use blogs and tweets to help develop a positive online presence.
Option B : To fit in all the AIDA elements, break a longer message into a multi-part tweet.
Explanation:
Websites and Twitter accounts of businesses are strong marketing resources which can help to portray an optimistic and knowledgeable presence online.
The concepts underneath AIDA even now relate to micro-names, even though you likely won't use the complete, four-part plan. Using catching and interesting interest recipients, and seek to always have a call for action. Do not spread endless retweets, numerous tweets, or other things that are more distressing to your viewers than they receive.
They’re focusing on the energetic drink called “ Neon Bolt”
<span>Answer:
At what unit sales level would WCC have the same EPS, assuming it undertakes the investment and finances it with debt or with stock? {Hint: V = variable cost per unit = $8,160,000/440,000, and EPS = [(PQ - VQ - F - I)(1 - T)]/N. Set EPSStock = EPSDebt and solve for Q.} Round your answer to the nearest whole.
units
At what unit sales level would EPS = 0 under the three production/financing setups - that is, under the old plan, the new plan with debt financing, and the new plan with stock financing? (Hint: Note that VOld = $10,200,000/440,000, and use the hints for Part b, setting the EPS equation equal to zero.) Round your answers to the nearest whole.
Old plan units
New plan with debt financing units
New plan with stock financing units
On the basis of the analysis in parts a through c, and given that operating leverage is lower under the new setup, which plan is the riskiest, which has the highest expected EPS, and which would you recommend? Assume here that there is a fairly high probability of sales falling as low as 250,000 units, and determine EPSDebt and EPSStock at that sales level to help assess the riskiness of the two financing plans. Round your answers to two decimal places.
EPSDebt = $
EPSStock = $</span>
Answer:
6,250 units; 7,000 units
Explanation:
Given that,
Fixed costs for proposal A = $50,000
Fixed costs for proposal B = $70,000
Variable cost for A = $12.00
Variable cost for B = $10.00
Revenue generated by each unit = $20.00
Let x be the number of units at break even point,
(a) Condition for break-even point in units:
Total cost = Total revenue
Fixed cost + Variable cost = (Number of units × Revenue generated by each unit)
50,000 + 12x = 20x
50,000 = 8x
6,250 = x
(b) Condition for break-even point in units:
Total cost = Total revenue
Fixed cost + Variable cost = (Number of units × Revenue generated by each unit)
70,000 + 10x = 20x
70,000 = 10x
7,000 = x
