<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
1. MC = Cost of raw material + Cost of time
MC = 5 plus (10 divide by 2)
MC = $10
2. TFC = $300
Q = 300
, AFC = TFC/Q = 300 divide by 300 = $1
3. His profit maximizing output would be higher
Reason: P = MR = $15
, MC = $10
Since MR > MC, and at the profit maximizing point MR = MC, it is better for Nicholas to increase his output.
4. His profit maximizing output would be higher
Reason: P = MR = $15
, MC = $4 + $5 = $9
Since MR > MC, and at the profit maximizing point MR = MC, it is better for Nicholas to increase his output.
Answer:
ROA = 6.6%
ROE 14.52%
Explanation:
profit margin = net income / sale = 12%
assets turn over = sales / assets = 0.55
equity mutiplier = assets / equity = 2.2
ROE = return on equity = net income / equity
ROA = return on equity = net income / assets
we use the fraction properties to get ROE and ROA
ROA = 6.6%
We apply the same property to get ROE
ROE = 14.52%
Answer:
BOL can be viewed as the authoritative record that is being given to a shipment organization by the transporter that incorporates the different insights regarding the item. The fundamental purpose behind the BOL to be gathered at the entryway ports is that these BOL are gotten at the port first as this is where the items are gotten in the nation and from that point these items are sent to inland RDCs. The items need to pay the traditions obligations and pass the various customs.
Answer:
This is the sample answer
Explanation:
After a natural disaster, such as a major hurricane, there is increased demand for gasoline, lumber, bottled water, clothing, and other essential goods as people try to replace and rebuild what was lost. At the same time, the supply of these goods likely decreases because of disruptions to factories and transportation. Under normal market conditions, producers would raise their prices at the first sign of trouble, both to offset their own losses from the disaster and to obtain optimal profits.
However, people who have lost everything need to start rebuilding as soon as possible at a price they can afford to pay. The sooner the community is rebuilt and back to normal, the sooner the local economy will return to normal for both consumers and producers. For this reason, I think the government should introduce price ceilings on essential goods during a disaster. Many people would not be able to buy the goods they need without price ceilings. Although producers lose out on maximizing their profits, their actual losses are limited because they are allowed to raise prices to cover production and transportation costs driven up by the disaster.
Because citizens benefit so greatly from them, I think emergency price ceilings are beneficial to the economy as long as producers do not suffer significant losses from them.
Michelle doesn't have to see $90 worth a movie a month, and she could mostly cut that one out, if not completely. She could also see if she is able to lower her internet and/or television bill by downgrading plans.
