All categories

2 years ago

Which two statements are true about batch size, lead time, and utilization? (Choose two.)

Business

1 answer:

Nataly_w [17]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The answers are b. As batch size increases, lead time decreases and d. Batch size is influenced by the Product Owner, utilization is influenced by the Development Team

Explanation:

Invariably, a larger batch size leads to increase in lead time due to the fact that it will take lesser time to process smaller batches and when there's a larger batch it takes more time. And ultimately, the batch size is influenced by the product owner because he/she determines the sixe of each product batch based on market demand while the development team conducts tests for utilization which guides them in making decisions that influence utilization.

You might be interested in

Knowledge Check 01 Which of the following statements about valuation allowances are true? (Select all that apply.) Check All Tha

Alina [70]

Answer:

• Under U.S. GAAP, companies recognize deferred tax assets and then reduce those assets with an offsetting valuation allowance if its is not more likely than not that the asset will be realized.

• Under IFRS, deferred tax assets only are recognizefd to begin with if its is probable (defined as '' more likely than not'') that they will be realized.

Explanation:

A deferred tax asset occurs when taxes are either been overpaid or there's an advance payment for them. In this scenario, they're not yet acknowledged in the income statement.

Valuation allowance is a reserve used by a business to offset the deferred tax asset. The statements that are true about the valuation allowance are:

• Under U.S. GAAP, companies recognize deferred tax assets and then reduce those assets with an offsetting valuation allowance if its is not more likely than not that the asset will be realized.

• Under IFRS, deferred tax assets only are recognizefd to begin with if its is probable (defined as '' more likely than not'') that they will be realized.

7 0

2 years ago

You have purchased 1 million shares in a restaurant chain venture. At this zero-stage investment, your company’s assets are $110

Drupady [299]

Answer:

(a) 1,370,000 shares

(b) 42.19%

Explanation:

Given that,

Shares in a restaurant chain venture = 1,000,000 shares

Price of each share = $1.00

(a) To raise the additional $1,370,000:

Shares will you need to sell:

= Additional amount ÷ Price of each share

= $1,370,000 ÷ $1.00

= 1,370,000 shares

(b) No. of Shares After investment:

= Shares need to sell + Shares in a restaurant chain venture

= 1,370,000 + 1,000,000

= 2,370,000 shares

Therefore, the fraction of the firm will you own after the VC investment:

= (Shares in a restaurant chain venture ÷ No. of Shares After investment) × 100

= (1,000,000 ÷ 2,370,000) × 100

= 0.4219 × 100

= 42.19%

3 0

2 years ago

Companies that manufacture products with a very ______ product life cycle have ______ as their core competency.

Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

short, innovation

Explanation:

Manufacturing of short product cycle have the innovation requires for competency compare to those companies that manufacture on long product cycle.

It should be noted that Companies that manufacture products with a very short product life cycle have innovation as their core competency.

4 0

2 years ago

B. At one time, the centrally planned economy of China encouraged farmers to produce

gladu [14]

Answer:

At one time, the centrally planned economy of China encouraged farmers to produce iron in their backyards, rather than have factories make iron. This proved unsuccessful, since most of the farmers' iron was of poor quality. Why do you think this approach was unsuccessful? How could this experiment become a success in a free market economy?

The reason why the approach whereby farmers make iron in their backyard could not work out is as a result of not being inclined in that market as they are only skilled in agriculture, also they do not understand the rhetorics of the business.

The experiment would be a success in a free market as anyone is allowed to sell such product, this gives room for competition and helps to price reduction which is good for the consumers, also it would help in improvement of such product's quality because of competition involved

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

What do you feel would be a minimally acceptable rate of pay? (ex. $X.XX or $XX,XXX):_______.

Veronika [31]

Correct question: I do not know if this question is complete or not but if i understand you well enough, I'd say that the minimally acceptable rate of pay will be in accordance to what is obtainable in yur state or area. $X.XX represents pay per hour while $XX.XXX represents pay per year.

Answer:

I would say Negotiable to be on the safe side if you can't come up with a certain amount by yourself.

Explanation:

When you have to fill on an application and it gets to the rate of pay, you either be on the safer side and write Negotiable if you do not want to sell yourself short or be too pricey. But it is almost certain that the rate of pay applicable in your state or area is what you will be getting per hour.

I hope this helps.

5 0

2 years ago