What does this question mean?
Both chose genres that present a true story of the Holocaust as one experienced it.
Answer:
The answer is Most noteworthy figure in old space science, astounding verisimilitude to the undeniable realities, lit up it with his hypotheses, got together the shrewdness.
Explanation:
Despite the fact that each tyke may now know a greater amount of the genuine realities of the heavenly movements than any time in recent memory Ptolemy knew, yet the way that his work practiced such an amazing impact on the human judgment for about sixty ages, demonstrates that it more likely than not been an uncommon generation. We should investigate the vocation of this awesome man to find wherein lay the mystery of that grand achievement which made him the unchallenged educator of mankind for such an extended period.
The elements that are considered technical are:
- Special Effects
- Scenery
- Costumes
An in depth study of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein would not be a short research paper. Ideally you would have to have a more specific research question/focus on one aspect of the novel. An in depth study is too broad.
An analysis of protagonists in Jane Austen's works once again would not be a short research paper, if it was limited to one or two of her books then yes but not all of them.
A comparison of Homers Illiad and Odyssey once again is too broad a topic and if you were to compare everything in both novels you would be looking at a rather lengthy research paper.
Moby D*ck is full of symbolism and if you could find a way to summarize effectively and succinctly the story and maybe just focus on the actual whale as the subject matter and what it represents in the book you could definitely make a good relatively short research paper out of it.
Alternatively would be an analysis of Edgar Allan Poe's narrative style in The Black Cat. The Black Cat is a short story and ideal for this type of research paper.