●✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎❀✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎●
Hi my lil bunny!
❧⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯☙
The underlined words in this excerpt from Dylan's "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll" are an example of sarcasm to emphasize the absurdity of Zanzinger's sentence.
- hyperbole to exaggerate the judge's orders
- synecdoche to represent the nation's entire legal system
- <u>sarcasm to emphasize the absurdity of Zanzinger's sentence </u>
- understatement to suggest that the situation was not as bad as it seemed
❧⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯☙
●✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎❀✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎✴︎●
If this helped you, could you maybe give brainliest..?
Also Have a great day/night!
❀*May*❀
Answer:
He newly appreciates it because he has gotten away from the feud, which was the opposite of "quiet and smooth and lovely." He also appreciates the freedom and liberation that comes with being on the raft with Jim.
Explanation:
no explanation but i hope that helps
Francie moves to Phoenix and a cactus grows in her yard.
Answer: Colin's evidence is not relevant to his claim<u> because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.</u>
Explanation: Colin's evidence is not related to his main claim, that is to say the assertion that drones do not invade people's privacy<u>. Instead of focusing on providing evidence that supports the idea that drones do not affect people's privacy negatively, Colin offers evidence related to the thought that flying drones is a sport </u>by stating that coordination and technical skills are necessary to fly drones. Therefore, it can be said that his argument lacks strength because it has not been properly supported.
