Answer:
Systematic error
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that none of the judges are biased, the most likely reason for this difference is the occurrence of systematic errors.
Systematic errors are errors introduced by inaccuracy in the experimental design, be it in the observation or measurement process.
In this case, the reaction time from observing the finish and stopping the clock for each judge might be different, which configures a systematic error.
From the given function modeling the height of the ball:
f(x)=-0.2x^2+1.4x+7
A] The maximum height of the ball will be given by:
At max height f'(x)=0
from f(x),
f'(x)=-0.4x+1.4
solving for x we get:
-0.4x=-1.4
x=3.5ft
thus the maximum height would be:
f(3.5)=-0.2(3.5)^2+1.4(3.5)+7
f(3.5)=9.45 ft
b]
How far from where the ball was thrown did this occur:
from (a), we see that at maximum height f'(x)=0
f'(x)=-0.4x+1.4
solving for x we get:
-0.4x=-1.4
x=3.5ft
This implies that it occurred 3.5 ft from where the ball was thrown.
c] How far does the ball travel horizontally?
f(x)=-0.2x^2+1.4x+7
evaluationg the expression when f(x)=0 we get:
0=-0.2x^2+1.4x+7
Using quadratic equation formula:
x=-3.37386 or x=10.3739
We leave out the negative and take the positive answer. Hence the answer 10.3739 ft horizontally.
9.9^2X1.79
9.9^2=98.01
98.01X1.79=175.4379
To solve for the system of equations, I will write the equation down as I rewrite the written form.
a number, n, (n) is added to 15 less than 3 times itself (+3n -15). The result is (=) 101. (101)
Now let's write only what's in the parenthesis.
n + 3n -15 = 101.
The correctly written form in your answers is:
3n - 15 + n = 101, your first answer.
