Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Risk identification.
Explanation:
Risk identification is one of the steps used in the risk management process. Risks are determined through the measurement of the parameters that define them, the size of the loss or possible damage, and the possibility that the loss or damage eventually takes place.
Below is to complete the question;
<span>How much money should Timothy and Tiffany deposit annually for 20 years in order to provide an income of $30,000 per year for the next 10 years? Assume the interest rate is a constant 4%.
</span>
<span>Use the annual rate formula.
You are given Future, F=$30,000
You are given interest, i=4% or 0.04
You are given time, n=10 years for future equation and n=20 years for annual equation.
Plug those numbers in the formulas your teacher gave you.</span>
Answer:
- Common Stock: 3,500,000
- Additional paid-in capital-Common Stock: 2,100,000
- Retained earnings: 995,000
Total stockholders' equity: 6,595,000
Explanation:
- <u>Common Stock:</u> Values at the common stocks par value. (3,500,000 = 700,000 * 5)
- <u>Additional paid-in capital-Common Stock: </u>Difference between the paid price by stockholders and par value. The negations made after the issue of the stocks are not taken into account because they don´t include the company. (2,100,000 = 700,000 * 3)
- <u>Retained earnings:</u> As the dividend are declared after the end of the accountable year they are not taken into account. So the retained earnings final balance include the beginning balance plus the net income of the accountable period. (995,000)
- <u>Total stockholders' equity: </u>Addition of the previous items.
Answer:
b. There is a fall in the wages paid to workers that grow roses.
Explanation:
A shift to the right in the supply curve means that the supply of roses increased the quantity of roses at the same price. This is only possible is a change in the cost structured improved the capacity of production of roses at the same use of resources. With a fall in salaries of workers is possible to hire more workers and increase the offer of total roses at a same level of previous cost
Answer:
Isn’t "corporate entrepreneurship" an oxymoron?
I guess that most people would believe that corporations and entrepreneurs and completely opposite, and for the most part they are right. But some corporations actually do have entrepreneurial spirit or at least try to. E.g. 3M is famous for allowing their employees some creative time so that they can come up with new ideas. Google is another example of a large corporation that allows for creative time while at work.
Do the characteristics of an established organization, such as its routines and structure, increase efficiency but at the same time kill any entrepreneurial spirit?
Routines, schedules and corporate structure not only kill, but they rather massacre and exterminate entrepreneurial spirit and creativity. One great example of how corporations do not allow people to think or act differently can be seen in the movie about Ford competing in Le Mans.
Is there any way that a company can have the best of both worlds?
I guess that it is difficult, but not impossible for a company to have corporate entrepreneurship. The problem is that corporations will probably believe that it is a waste of money to pay for their employees to do nothing and just wander around thinking about new ideas. Creativity has a cost and not everyone is willing to pay for it.
