Based on the given situation, the best answer for this would
be:
an inducement to marriage
This is referred to Jonathan’s Swift’s ironic proposal of
offering babies as food for an inducement of marriage, this writer had used
situational irony to make a laughable reason to the audience of how drastic decisions
can be.
Answer:
Over accommodation
Explanation:
Over accommodation is a process of adaptation that is given by Jean Piaget. It is altering the schema of a person regarding any objects or things. The schema has been changed by getting new information. The new information leads to change into a new schema about an object. This process does not only occur with the children but it also occurs with adults as well. When you are trying to introduce new information but conflicting with old schema then the person tries to accommodate the information that is inside the mind and confirm that information with the information outside in the world.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, This illustrates the Gestalt principle of Closure.
Explanation:
The Gestalt was a psychologist, who gave many principles, like principle of closure, principle of proximity, etc. According to Gestalt, the human brain is designed in such a way that it perceives the things in their complete whole, even if there are certain gaps or absent parts in it. For example, if there are certain lines in a circle, the human brain still perceives it a whole circle.
Similarly in this example, when the builder sees the home from one angle, it appeared to be completely framed but from the other angle, he sees some gaps. This is when he sees it closely, he sees the gap. Otherwise the home appeared be to completely framed at first glance. This is the principle of closure.
The charge is "<span>straightforward corruption".
Corruption is a type of deceptive nature embraced by a man endowed with a place of specialist, regularly to secure individual advantage. straightforward corruption refers to any type of police unfortunate behavior that gives guide money related advantage to police.
</span>
A. good A; good B
B. both goods; neither good
C. good B; good A
D. neither good; both goods
E. neither good; neither good
Answer:
A. good A; good B
Explanation:
The comparative advantage refers to the ability a country has to produce a good or service with a lower opportunity cost which is the benefit lost when deciding to produce one product over another. According to the table, we can see that Country 1 has a comparative advantage in the production of good A because it has a lower opportunity cost and Country 2 has a comparative advantage in the production of good B because of the lower opportunity cost.
