Answer:
Bounded rationality.
Explanation:
Tonya was feeling the effects of bounded rationality. According to Herbert Simon, people’s rationality is limited when making a decision. The rationality is limited by the information the person has, by the cognitive limitations and the time available to make the decision. In this case, if Tonya had been really rational she would have chosen the overseas company. However, she lacked information about shipment and that uncertainty led her to choose the domestic company instead, even if it had many disadvantages.
<span>Darnell may have injured the hippocampus.
</span><span>
</span><span>This part of the brain is responsible for mediating the storage of new information and its recovery, for that reason, when this area of the Limbic System is damaged, Darnell cannot store new information.
Epilepsy is a disease in the nervous system that is due to an unusual electrical activity in the cerebral cortex. Seizures and loss of consciousness are among the main characteristics of the disorder.
Generally, epilepsy is treated by means of anticonvulsant medications, however, sometimes the pathology is so severe that a surgical method is used.
</span><span>
</span><span>
I hope this information can help you.</span>
Answer:
Free association
Explanation:
Free association is the expression of the content of consciousness without censorship as an aid in gaining access to unconscious processes.
Answer:
An institutional review board (IRB), also known as an independent ethics committee (IEC), ethical review board (ERB), or research ethics board (REB), is a type of committee that applies research ethics by reviewing the methods proposed for research to ensure that they are ethical.
Explanation:
- Conducting initial and continuing review of research;
- Reporting findings and actions to the investigator and the institution;
- Determining which projects require review more often than annually;
- Determining which projects need verification from sources other than the investigator that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review;
- Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and ensuring that changes in approved research, during the period for which IRB approval has already been given, may not be initiated without IRB review and approval except where necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the human subjects;
- Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB, appropriate institutional officials, any department or agency head and OHRP for research conducted or supported by HHS, and the FDA for FDA-regulated research of:
- Any unanticipated problems involving risks to human subjects or others;
- Any instance of serious or continuing noncompliance with the applicable HHS and FDA regulations or the requirements or determinations of the IRB; Any suspension or termination of IRB approval.
HHS and FDA regulations do not provide additional detail on the content of IRB written procedures, which gives IRBs the flexibility to establish procedures best suited to their own operations.
