The correct answer is personalization.
This is a type of fallacy where you involve somebody's personality into an argument, even though it is completely unnecessary or wrong to do that. For example, if you are going to a dinner party and you are late, and the dinner is overcooked (completely unrelated to you being late), you might start thinking that it happened because of your tardiness, whereas that is obviously not the case.
There were many key elements and financial innovations that made Florence and Venice financial centres of the world, but one of the most important was the banking system that issues credit and charged interest.
Answer:
It can be inferred that Mark lives alone and could be financially unstable.
Explanation:
There can be several factors regarding such practice of Mark. Since he buys from a nearby store that has limited variety of products and canned food it can be assumed that Mark lives alone and there are not much residents to demand for change in purchasing of food items. Mark might also be financially unstable to travel to some other store variety products are available and are expensive for him to buy.
Moreover, it's also a possibility that Mark prefers canned food over fresh food.
Answer:
Option B, Discrimination, is the right answer.
Explanation:
In the context of human social behavior, discrimination is biased treatment. This treatment can emerge due to the class, category or group of that person to which he belonged.
Discrimination consists of the practice of a person or society, based on their original or regarded membership in a particular organisation or social class, "in a sense that is worse than the approach people are generally treated.
According to the given question, Mona who avoids providing her assistance to a non-White person is an example of discrimination.
Answer:
The most effective responses will be those aimed at restoring harmony between supervisors, allowing all sectors to work efficiently. The least effective responses will be those that seek to help only one supervisor or just one, or some sectors, to the detriment of the others.
Explanation:
As we can see, Jamie is in a situation where his management is very important. This is because the sector of the 9 supervisors on the front line of a given service, are in conflict with each other, which ends up harming the company's success, since it is necessary that all sectors work together.
The meeting established by Jamie, has the responsibility to evaluate the arguments of the supervisors and choose those that will bring an effective result within the company. Jamie must choose as efficient the arguments that show cooperative forms among supervisors, which promote the good functioning of all sectors. However, he must consider as non-efficient, all those arguments that provide separatist ideas and that promote the growth of only some sectors to the detriment of others.
