answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
1 year ago
10

In each of the following cases, calculate the accounting break-even and the cash break-even points. Ignore any tax effects in ca

lculating the cash break-even. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)
Case Unit Price Unit Variable Cost Fixed Costs Depreciation
1 $3,070 $2,475 $7,060,000 $1,550,000
2 96 61 47,000 250,000
3 21 5 2,700 730
Business
1 answer:
Sloan [31]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

Accounting Break-Even

Case 1 = $14,350   Case 2 = $8,485.71    Case 3 = $214.375

Cash Break-Even

Case 1 = $11,766.67    Case 2 = $1342.86     Case 3 = $168.75

Explanation:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-

Accounting Break-Even = (Fixed Cost + Depreciation Cost) ÷ (Price Unit -Variable Unit)

Case 1 - ($7,060,000 + $1,550,000) ÷ ($3075 - $2,475)

= $8,610,000 ÷ $600

= $14,350

Case 2 - ( $47,000 + $250,000) ÷ ($96 - $61)

= $297,000 ÷ 35 = $8,485.71

Case 3 - ($2,700 + $730) ÷ ($21 - $5)

= $3,430 ÷ $16 = $214.375

Cash Break Even = Fixed Cost ÷ (Price Unit - Variable Unit)

Case 1 - $7,060,000 ÷ ($3075 - $2,475)

= $7,060,000 ÷ $600

= $11,766.67

Case 2 - $47,000 ÷ ($96 - $61)

= $47,000 ÷ $35 = $1342.86

Case 3 - $2,700 ÷ ($21 - $5)

= $2,700 ÷ $16 = $168.75

You might be interested in
1. Advertising is important for most companies, es- pecially companies such as P&G that sells mostly to end customers. But,
omeli [17]

Answer:

1. Companies like P&G have their customer base consisting on end customers whose choice of toothpaste and towels which can change depending on multiple influencers like cost, other attractive features in competitors, freebies etc. Thus a strong customer focus and reach is essential to even retain the current customer base. Thus these companies need to focus on advertising to remain competitive in the current market atmosphere.

2. The numbers of advertising companies can be appropriately engaged based on cost and effectiveness as long as there are sufficient companies customizing the advertising and marketing efforts for the region in focus. If there are too many agencies running the advertising, the cost could be very high. If the number of agencies are decreased to too low and same advertising efforts are used in different type of demographic regions, the impact and effectiveness of the advertising could be less and not as effective as required. Thus choosing the sufficient number of agencies to reach all the required demographic regions is essential to balance the cost and effectiveness of advertising.

3. Innovation will always be rewarded in the current market atmosphere. If we look at the current market position of P&G, seeing that the they are currently placed in a good position with good presence in multiple products for different customer segments. Thus after studying the market and weighing all the aspects, it could make sense for P&G to consolidate and cut the less profitable businesses.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Andrew is deciding whether to remain in the home he has lived in for the past ten years, which is located very near his work, or
vekshin1

Answer:

The decision that is not relevant to Andrew is:

b. Cost of the old house.

Explanation:

a) The cost of the old house ($160,000) is not relevant to Andrew decision challenges.  It is a sunk or past cost.  Past costs are not relevant because they do not make a difference in the decision or the alternative to choose.  Since Andrew will be impacted by the driving distance to work from his new house, the market value of the old house, and the cost of the new house, these are relevant in Andrew's decision.

4 0
1 year ago
The management of Brinkley Corporation is interested in using simulation to estimate the profit per unit for a new product. The
OleMash [197]

Answer:

(a) : Profit = Selling price -purchase cost - labour cost -transportation cost

Profit per unit for the base-case = 45 - 11 - 24 - 3 = $ 7 / unit

Profit per unit for the worst-case = 45 - 12 - 25 - 5 = $ 3/ unit

Profit per unit for the best-case = 45 - 10 - 20 - 3 = $ 12 / unit

b) based on simulation model mean profit = 45 - 11 - 24 - 5 = $ 5/ unit and 45 - 10 - 25 - 3 = $ 7 / unit

(c) : Simulation approach will provide a distribution of the profit per unit values. By calculating percentage of simulation trials provide us profit in what-if scenario.

d)  As evaluated above, based on simulation model, minimum profit is $ 5/ unit. Hence management's belief of non-sustainability of project is right. Less than $ 5 / unit profit scenario is unacceptably low.

Explanation:

simulaton model for b is in the attachment below.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mark has $100,000 to invest. His financial consultant advises him to diversify his investment in three types of bonds: short-ter
Airida [17]

Answer:

Mark should invest:

  • $30,000 in short term bonds
  • $30,000 in intermediate term bonds
  • $40,000 in long term bonds

Explanation:

S = short term bonds

I = intermediate term bonds

L = long term bonds

S + I + L = 100,000

0.04S + 0.06I + 0.07L = 0.058 x 100,000 = 5,800

S = I

2S + L = 100,000

L = 100,000 - 2S (now we replace both I and L)

0.04S + 0.06s + 0.07(100,000 - 2S) = 5,800

0.1S + 7,000 - 0.14S = 5,800

7,000 - 5,800 = 0.14S - 0.1S

1,200 = 0.04S

S = 1,200 / 0.04 = 30,000

I = 30,000

L = 100,000 - 60,000 = 40,000

5 0
1 year ago
Waldron inc. is considering selling to a group of new customers that will bring in credit sales of $24,000 with a return on sale
Andrew [12]

Answer:

30%

Explanation:

The computation of return on investment is shown below:-

Return on Sales = Credit sales ×  Return on sales

= $24,000 × 5%

= $1,200

Investment in Accounts Receivable

= $24,000 ×  1 ÷ 6

= $4,000

Return on Investment = Return on Sales ÷  Investment in Accounts Receivable  × 100

= $1,200 ÷ $4,000  × 100

= 30%

Therefore for computing the return on investment we simply divide the investment in account receivable by return on sales.

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A household appliances manufacturer has hired you to help analyze their social media datasets to determine which of their refrig
    8·1 answer
  • Kasten, Inc budgeted 10,000 widgets for production during 2013. Kasten has capacity to produce 12,000 units. Fied factory overhe
    15·1 answer
  • Nicole works for a reputed company that operates within the construction industry. Nicole recently learned that a civil engineer
    13·1 answer
  • Washington inc. issued $705,000 of 6%, 20-year bonds at 98 on January 1, 2009. Through January 1, 2017, Washington amortized $8,
    8·1 answer
  • Solartech Corporation, a U.S. exporter, sold a solar heating station to a Japanese customer at a price of 143.5 million yen, whe
    12·1 answer
  • The manager of a canned-food processing plant has two labeling machine options. On the basis of a rate of return analysis with a
    10·1 answer
  • CHEGG At the beginning of Year 2, the Redd Company had the following balances in its accounts: Cash $ 6,900 Inventory 15,000 Lan
    8·1 answer
  • Kit Company borrows $5 million at 12% on January 1, 2016, specifically for the purpose of financing the construction of a buildi
    6·1 answer
  • A risk analyst gives Oracle Corporation, the enterprise software and database management firm, a CAPM equity beta of 1.2. As of
    12·1 answer
  • Kirkwood acquires 100 percent of the outstanding voting shares of Soufflot Company on January 1, 2018. To obtain these shares, K
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!