Answer:
the government's sovereign immunity
Explanation:
In the US, the federal and state governments have sovereign immunity which means that they cannot be sued unless they agree to it. In the US, the federal government waived their immunity protection from a series of possible torts through the Federal Tort Claims Act. But that law does not include litter or accidents occurring in highways.
Sovereign immunity basically states that the federal government cannot be sued for its actions unless those actions are included in the Federal Tort Claims Act. To be able to sue a state government other rules apply, specially regarding the circumstances around the reason for the claim.
Answer:
Fragmented organizational culture
Explanation:
Jazmine and Estaphanie work in a fragmented organizational culture. This kind of culture refers to the employees who are not connected to each other but are connected to their work. They have friendly relations with people who do not work with them.
This similar concept is also explained in the question where people participate in activities outside of work and rarely make any friends at work.
I hope the answer is helpful.
Thanks for asking.
The given scenario clearly illustrates Negative leniency
.
Option C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The performance appraisal is a routine analysis of the results of an individual and of a company's total commitment. A performance appraisal, also defined as an «yearly review», "performance review," or "individual appraisal," assesses the ability, success and progress of an employee or its lack of it.
The manager who is neither tough nor easy with rating employees is committed to negative and positive leniency misconceptions. In the performance evaluation process, the employee's unjustified expectations for increases, promotions or tough jobs can be increased by positive leniency.
The worker may be sick of hitting the head against a wall with excessive slowness or toughness/strictness because the manager can not be pleased despite how hard the person tries.
Answer:
•Filing for bankruptcy can eliminate debt.
•A major consequence of bankruptcy is that it can harm an individual's chances of receiving additional credit.
Explanation:
Bankruptcy can be defined in three ways.
1. Bankruptcy involves restructuring debts owed by a debtor inorder to be able to pay them. In other words, debtors would file for bankruptcy if they want more time to have their debts restructured(having a payment plan). This gives them another opportunity to pay up their debts.
2. Bankruptcy is when a company sell off it's assets or liquidate them inorder to pay up the debts owed to creditors.
3. Bankruptcy is when an individual who earns wages or has steady source of income is allowed to have a payment plan in order to pay part of his or her debt.
In the above defined bankruptcy options, the chances of getting additional credit after paying up the initial is low. The reason is that these debts would reflect in the credit report of would be borrower in the future hence pose a red flag to organizations that would grant the credit.
It is important for individuals or companies to manage their credit efficiently. Though filing for bankruptcy can eliminate debt, the major future consequence of it is that it can harm an individual's chances of receiving additional credit.
