Answer:
b. $358,500
Explanation:
Given;
Retained Earnings at December 31, 2018 = $300,000
In 2019,
Revenue = $600,000
Expenses = $525,000
Declared and paid dividends = $16,500
Retained earnings on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2019
= $300,000 + $600,000 - $525,000 - $16,500
= $358,500
The right option is b. $358,500
Answer: 1 year
Explanation: According to the Defence Federal Acquisition Regulation under 237.106, personal service contracts that apply to consulting or expert services will be limited to one year. However this will only apply to duties that are temporary (limited to 1 year, or 12 months), or non cumulative days (needs to be 130 days or more that are broken up within a year). During this time the officer contracting the service will enter into a contract, make an order, or exercise options for various services that do not exceed 1 year.
Answer:
Adhocracy Culture
Explanation:
An adhocracy culture is based on energy and creativity. Employees are encouraged to take risks, and leaders are seen as innovators or entrepreneurs. The organization is held together by experimentation, with an emphasis on individual ingenuity and freedom. The core values are based on change and agility.
Answer:
Decrease by $132,100
Explanation:
Computation of the given data are as follow:-
We can calculate the Operating Income by using following formula:-
Fixed Cost = Fixed Cost * Dropped Rate
= $193,000 * 30/100
= $57,900
So, Operating Income = Sales - Variable Cost - Fixed Cost
= $,1050,000 - $860,000 - $57,900
= $132,100
According to the Analysis, the operating income will be decrease by $132,100 if the business segment is eliminated.
Answer:
a. The party control of government when Congress passed legislation in 2014 to repeal the ACA was when Republicans gained majority seats in both chambers of Congress. This Republican control of Congress was the catalyst for the repeal of the ACA in 2014.
b. The Republican representative who cast a vote in favor of the ACA bill in 2009 followed strictly his constituency mandate.
c. When President Obama vetoed the ACA repeal, the Republicans could proceed to court to try to use the judicial branch of government to implement their legislative goals by requesting for constitutional interpretation of the repealed bill.
If this had happened, it would have seriously hampered the implementation and success of the Affordable Care Act for partisan reasons.
Explanation:
a) Congress is the legislative arm of government that makes the law. The executive implements the law. The judiciary is in charge of the interpretation and application the law to real situations. But when the President vetoes a bill, Congress can override the veto by ensuring that 2/3 of both chambers pass the law. Alternatively, Congress can ask for a judicial interpretation.
