Bills accounting profit is
equals to revenue ($250,000) minus explicit (monetary) cost (50,000 and
30,000), while his economic profit is equals to accounting profit minus
implicit (opportunity) cost (3,000 and 100,000). Accounting profit is $170,000
and Economic profit is $67,000.
<span>Economic profit is always lower
than accounting profit because explicit costs and implicit costs are both
deducted to revenue. Implicit costs are cost that he should have earned if he
gives up his present resources. These costs are projected cost and are not yet
incurred.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is C that is $(140,000)
Explanation:
Elimination of the North Division will result in the overall net income or loss which is computed as:
Elimination of the North Division will result in the overall net income or loss = South Net Income (NI) - North's allocated costs
where
South Net Income is $100,000
North's allocated costs is $240,000
So,
= $100,000 - $240,000
= $(140,000)
Therefore, it will result in loss of $140,000
Note: The Net Income will be decline or decrease by $240,000 when the division was dropped.
Answer:
the government's sovereign immunity
Explanation:
In the US, the federal and state governments have sovereign immunity which means that they cannot be sued unless they agree to it. In the US, the federal government waived their immunity protection from a series of possible torts through the Federal Tort Claims Act. But that law does not include litter or accidents occurring in highways.
Sovereign immunity basically states that the federal government cannot be sued for its actions unless those actions are included in the Federal Tort Claims Act. To be able to sue a state government other rules apply, specially regarding the circumstances around the reason for the claim.
Answer: True
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Esther and Holly have a disagreement over which company to present their business idea to and that they decide to disregard their different stances on environmental issues and focus solely on which business will provide them with the most resources in the short-term.
The above scenario shows that Esther and Holly are focusing on interests, and not positions. This is shown by them disregard their different stances and focusing on a common goal.
