answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reil [10]
2 years ago
13

Karen Wilson and Katie Smith are looking at the company's health care options and trying to determine how much their net pay wil

l decrease if they sign up for the qualified cafeteria plan offered by the company. Karen, a married woman with four exemptions, earns $2,250 per biweekly payroll. Katie, a single woman with one exemption, also earns $2,075 per biweekly payroll. The biweekly employee contribution to health care that would be subject to the cafeteria plan is $115.
Required:


Compute the taxable income for Karen and Katie.



Karen’s taxable income if she declines to participate in the cafeteria plan: _____


Karen’s taxable income if she participates in the cafeteria plan: _____


Katie’s taxable income if she declines to participate in the cafeteria plan: _____


Katie’s taxable income if she participates in the cafeteria plan:______
Business
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Without cafeteria plan Karen taxable income is 2250 dollars and with cafeteria plan the taxable income is $2135.

Without cafeteria plan Katie taxable income is 2075 dollars and with cafeteria plan the taxable income is $1960.

Explanation:

A married women Karen earns = $2250

Katie single women earn = $2075

Employee contribution to health care = $115

If the Karen decline to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2250 (wages).

If the Karen accept to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2250 - $115 (contribution) = $2135

If Katie declined to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2075 (wages).

If Katie accept to participate in the cafeteria then her taxable income is $2075 - $115 (contribution) = $1960

You might be interested in
When one person seeks to satisfy his or her own interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, that pe
Dimas [21]

Answer:

Option A is correct one.

Competing

Explanation:

When one person seeks to satisfy his or her own interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, that person is using the conflict-handling intention of <u>Competing.</u>

When one person seeks to satisfy his or her interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, he is competing. The competition involves authoritative and assertive behaviours.

8 0
2 years ago
A cereal company's cost, in thousands of dollars, is represented by the function C ( x ) = 2 x + 4500 and its revenue, in thousa
maxonik [38]

Answer:

31,500

Explanation:

Cost function, C (x) = 2 x + 4500

Revenue function, R (x) = 5 x

Profit = Total revenue - Total cost

         = R(x) - C(x)

         = 5 x - [2 x + 4500]

         = 3 x - 4,500

If company sells 12,000 boxes, then profit will be:

=  3 x - 4,500

= 3(12,000) - 4,500

= 36,000 - 4,500

= 31,500

Therefore, 31,500 is the profit earn by the company by selling 12,000 boxes of cereal.

5 0
2 years ago
Last year Lowell Inc. had a total assets turnover of 1.40 and an equity multiplier of 1.75. Its sales were $295,000 and its net
katrin [286]

Answer:

ROE would have changed by 8.52%

Explanation:

First we calculate the current ROE using Dupont Equation which gives ROE as,

ROE = Net Income/Sales * Sales/Total Assets * Total Assets/Equity

or

ROE = Net Profit Margin * Total Assets Turnover * Equity Multiplier

  • Current ROE = 10600/295000 * 1.4 * 1.75 = 0.0880 or 8.8%

The condition says that the net income could have increased to 20850 but other factors will remain constant. Thus, to calculate new ROE, we will calculate the new Net Profit margin but the total assets turnover and the equity multiplier will remain constant as sales assets and capital structure is not changing.

  • New ROE = 20850/295000 * 1.4 * 1.75 = 0.17316 or 17.32%
  • The ROE would have changed by 17.32 - 8.80 = 8.52%
7 0
2 years ago
In 2017 Sabrina earned an annual salary of $100,000 as an engineer. In 2018, her income rose to $105,000. The inflation rate in
ivolga24 [154]

Answer:

Both Sabrina's nominal and real income increased

Explanation:

Her nominal income during 2017 was $100,000 and it increased to $105,000 during 2018,  a $5,000 increase.

Sabrina's real income during 2017 was $100,000 (using 2017 as the base year), and her real income during 2018 was = $105,000 / 1.02 = $102,941. That means that her real income increased by $2,941

3 0
1 year ago
In both the United States and France, the demand for haircuts is given by QD=300−10P . However, in the United States, the supply
grigory [225]

Answer:

a. P = 20 and Q = 100 in the United States; and also P = 20 and Q = 100 in France.

b. P = 23.33 and Q = 166.70 in the United States; and P = 26 and Q = 140 in France.

Explanation:

Note: The part b of the requirement is not complete. The entire question is therefore represented with the complete pat b before answering the question as follows:

In both the United States and France, the demand for haircuts is given by QD=300−10P . However, in the United States, the supply is given by QS=−300+20P , while in France, the supply is given by QS=−33.33+6.67P .

Required:

a. What are the equilibrium prices and quantities of haircuts in the two countries?

b. Suppose that the demand for haircuts in both countries increases by 100 units at each price, so that the new demand is QD = 400 - 10P. What are the new equilibrium prices and quantities of haircuts in the two countries?

The explanation to the answers is now provided as follows:

a. What are the equilibrium prices and quantities of haircuts in the two countries?

In economics, an equilibrium occurs at point where the quantities demanded is equal to the quantities supplied.

Let Q denotes equilibrium quantity and P denotes equilibrium price, the equilibrium prices and quantities of haircuts in the two countries can therefore be calculated as follows:

<u>In the United States</u>

QD =300 − 10P

QS= −300 + 20P

Since at equilibrium, QD = QS, we can therefore solve for P by equating the two equations above as follows:

300 - 10P = −300 + 20P

300 + 300 = 20P + 10P

600 = 30P

P = 600 / 30

P = 20

To obtain equilibrium quantity, we substitute P = 20 into any QD and QS since at equilibrium QD = QS. Using QD, we have:

Q = 300 – 10(20)

Q = 300 – 200

Q = 100

Therefore, P = 20 and Q = 100 in the United States.

<u>In France</u>

QD = 300 − 10P

QS= −33.33 + 6.67P

Since at equilibrium, QD = QS, we can therefore solve for P by equating the two equations above as follows:

300 - 10P = −33.33 + 6.67P

300 + 33.33 = 6.67P + 10P

333.33 = 16.67P

P = 333.33 / 16.67

P = 20

To obtain equilibrium quantity, we substitute P = 20 into any QD and QS since at equilibrium QD = QS. Using QD, we have:

Q = 300 – 10(20)

Q = 300 – 200

Q = 100

Therefore, P = 20 and Q = 100 also in France.

b. Suppose that the demand for haircuts in both countries increases by 100 units at each price, so that the new demand is QD = 400 - 10P. What are the new equilibrium prices and quantities of haircuts in the two countries?

<u>In the United States</u>

QD = 400 − 10P

QS= −300 + 20P

Since at equilibrium, QD = QS, we can therefore solve for P by equating the two equations above as follows:

400 - 10P = −300 + 20P

400 + 300 = 20P + 10P

700 = 30P

P = 700 / 30

P = 23.33

To obtain equilibrium quantity, we substitute P = 20 into any QD and QS since at equilibrium QD = QS. Using QD, we have:

Q = 400 – 10(23.33)

Q = 400 – 233.30

Q = 166.70

Therefore, P = 23.33 and Q = 166.70 in the United States.

<u>In France</u>

QD = 400 − 10P

QS= −33.33 + 6.67P

Since at equilibrium, QD = QS, we can therefore solve for P by equating the two equations above as follows:

400 - 10P = −33.33 + 6.67P

400 + 33.33 = 6.67P + 10P

433.33 = 16.67P

P = 433.33 / 16.67

P = 25.99 = 26

To obtain equilibrium quantity, we substitute P = 20 into any QD and QS since at equilibrium QD = QS. Using QD, we have:

Q = 400 – 10(26)

Q = 400 – 260

Q = 140

Therefore, P = 26 and Q = 140 in France.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In a perfectly competitive industry, the industry demand curve is ____, while in a monopolistic industry, the industry demand cu
    6·1 answer
  • The company you work for currently has ISDN service in place. Your supervisor wishes to know what sort of ISDN service is being
    14·1 answer
  • Lithium, Inc. is considering two mutually exclusive projecLithium, Inc. is considering two mutually exclusive projects, A and B.
    12·1 answer
  • Boat's product manager continues to perform well in the market. However, a competing product is coming on strong and is looking
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose you invest $500 in a stock mutual fund at the end of each month. When you retire at the end of your 35-year career, your
    5·1 answer
  • Wildhorse Construction Company had a contract starting April 2021, to construct a $24900000 building that is expected to be comp
    5·1 answer
  • Greene Corporation Balance Sheets At December 31
    10·1 answer
  • If you owe suppliers $240 and typically buy $40 worth of products per day, then your Days Payable equals _____________, fill in
    14·2 answers
  • To _____ an activity means to shorten the time it will take. A. smash B. fund C. crash D. aggregate E. matrix
    6·1 answer
  • There are three equally-sized distinct subpopulations in Utopolis: unemployed, workers, and retirees. There are four possible so
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!