I think the answer is $113.1. The question was confusing so sorry if it’s wrong.
R(t)=10t+20. This shows the first 20 pesos, and the additional 10 pesos for every hour. Hope this helps.
Answer:
0 tests
Yes, this procedure is better on the average than testing everyone, it makes it less cumbersome.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the information:
Let P be the probability that a randomly selected individual has the disease = 0.1. N individuals are randomly selected, thereafter, blood samples of each person would be tested after combining all specimens. Should in case one person has the disease then it yields a positive result and test should be set for each person.
Let Y be number tests
For n = 3 there are two possibilities. If no one has the disease then the value is 1 otherwise the value is 4, here P = 0.1
Therefore, for Y = 1
P(Y-1) = P(no one has disease)
= 0.9³
= 0.729
If Y = 4
P(Y-4) = 1-P(y = 1)
= 1 - 0.729 = 0.271
The expected number of tests using this formular gives
E(Y) = 1×0.729 + 4×0.271
E(Y) = 0
Answer:
The full answer from this specific division equation is 403.58, in numeric form.
Therefore, if you multiply the quotient with the divisor, you'll get the dividend used in the equation, which is:
D. 40358
