answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fofino [41]
2 years ago
3

A police office claims that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 65%. To test this claim, a random sample of

200 drivers is taken and its determined that 126 people are wearing seat belts. The following is the setup for this hypothesis test:
H0:p=0.65
Ha:p<0.65
In this example, the p-value was determined to be 0.277. Come to a conclusion and interpret the results for this hypothesis test for a proportion (use a significance level of 5%)
Select the correct answer below:
A. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 65%.
B. There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 65%.
C. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 35%.
D. There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude that the pronortion of people wearing seat belts is less than 35%
Mathematics
1 answer:
Gnesinka [82]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Option A - There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 65%

Step-by-step explanation:

The police officers claim is that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 65%.

Now, we are told that the p - value is 0.277.

In hypothesis, for a significance value of 0.05, if the P value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and if P value is greater than or equal to 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Now, since the significance level is 5% = 0.05,we can see that the P-value is greater than the significance value of 0.05. Thus, we fail to reject the police claim that the proportion of people wearing seat belts is less than 65%.

So the correct option is A.

You might be interested in
Consider the equation pV=kTN , where k is a constant. Select all of the correct answers that describe the variation between vari
Mumz [18]

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

Rule: If the variables are on the same side of the equal sign, they vary INVERSELY.

If the variables are on the opposite side of the equal Sign, they very DIRECTLY.

a) T and V

  • Opposite sides
  • Directly

b) p and T

  • Opposite Sides
  • Directly

c) N and V

  • Opposite Sides
  • Directly

d)  N and T

  • Same Side
  • Inversely

e)  p and N

  • Opposite Sides
  • Directly

f)  V and P

  • Same Side
  • Inversely.
4 0
2 years ago
How does the saying "money breeds money" apply to simple interest?
r-ruslan [8.4K]
It applies because interest slowly increases the amount of money gained. IF you have any Tolkien related questions, feel free to ask me

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The function p(x) = -2(x-9)2 + 100 used to determine the profit on T-shirts sold for x dollars. What would the profit from sales
Elden [556K]

Answer:

$28.

Step-by-step explanation:

p(x) = -2(x - 9)^2 + 100

If the prices (x) = 15 dollars we work out the profit by substituting x = 15 in the above formula:

p(15) = -2(15 - 9)^2 + 100

= -2 * 6^2 + 100

= $28.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Edward deposited $6,000 into a savings account 4 years ago. The simple interest rate is 3%. How much money did Edward earn in in
GaryK [48]
Hello IdontKnowHowToMath,

first, converting R percent to r a decimal
r = R/100 = 3%/100 = 0.03 per year.

Solving our equation:
A = 6000(1 + (0.03 × 4)) = 6720
A = $6,720.00

The total amount accrued, principal plus interest, from simple interest on a principal of $6,000.00 at a rate of 3% per year for 4 years is $6,720.00.
6 0
2 years ago
Consider the conjecture that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is ALWAYS irrational. To try to prove this co
miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

B) irrational. Since an irrational number cannot equal a rational number.  

The premise that c is rational is false

Step-by-step explanation:

The assumption that c is rational means that the difference c-a must be rational. That difference is b, so b=c-a would mean that b must be rational. But b is defined to be irrational. Since an irrational number cannot equal a rational number, a contradiction arises and the assumption that c is rational must be false. Therefore the sum (c) must be irrational. (B)

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the gambling habits of chevalier de​ mère help launch the mathematical study of​ probability?
    13·1 answer
  • A business bought some compact cars that cost $15,000 each, and some full–sized cars, that cost $23,000 each. A total of 20 cars
    11·1 answer
  • Factor
    13·2 answers
  • Which interval for the graphed function contains the local minimum?
    13·2 answers
  • If DGH ~ DEF, find the value of x.
    6·1 answer
  • You put $500 in an account that earns 4% annual interest. The interest earned each year is added to the principal to create a ne
    14·1 answer
  • Sierra is selling bracelets to raise money for the Language Club at school. Each bracelet with yellow beads sells for $5. Each b
    10·1 answer
  • Logan earned $8 for each dog he walked last summer. This summer, he raised his fee to $9 per dog. Express the change in Logan’s
    14·1 answer
  • ASAP NO WORK JUST ANSWER
    6·2 answers
  • Jack walks onto an elevator at floor level 2. The elevator goes up 3 floors, down 8 floors, and back up 11 floors. What floor is
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!