If Ray earns $900 a week and deductions are 28% Ray's take home pay is:
$648 a week
If we assume that the deductions of 28% are taken out of the $900 weekly we will multiply 900 by 0.28 = 252. Then subtract 252 which is the deduction amount from the 900 and we end up with take home pay of $648.
Answer:
Direct labor hour per unit= 0.87 hours
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A particular product requires 0.71 direct labor-hours per unit.
The allowance for breaks and personal needs is 0.04 direct labor-hours per unit. The allowance for cleanup, machine downtime, and rejects is 0.12 direct labor-hours per unit.
<u>The total direct labor hour per unit is the time required to produce one unit.</u>
Direct labor hour per unit= 0.71 + 0.04 + 0.12
Direct labor hour per unit= 0.87 hours
Answer:
Please find the income statement below;
Explanation:
<u>Single step Income statement</u>
Revenues
Net sales 2,419,200
Interest revenue 39,300
<em>Total revenues 2,458,500</em>
Expenses
Cost of goods sold 1,464,600
Admin. expenses 216,400
Selling expenses 294,800
Interest expense 46,000
<em>Total expenses 2,021,800</em>
<em><u>Net Income </u></em><em> </em><u><em>436,700</em></u>
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.