Answer:
Cantor the salesman,
1. probed Doris to know the state of her finances in a casual manner,
2. created fear in her by telling her of the possibility of dealing with the IRS and later,
3. went upfront in asking her about her card details.
Explanation:
In episode 680, of Anatomy of a scam, we learn about skills employed by salesmen to elicit delicate information from their prospects. Cantor, a seasoned salesman employs this tactics in his phone conversation with Doris. To know the state of her finances, Cantor probed Doris for delicate information like the amount of savings she had and the mortgage she owes. Because he was relaxed in asking these questions. Doris was more wiling to open up.
In trying to get her to pay the membership fee, he presented a likely problem which he explained joining the business would help her solve. When he wanted to extract the details from her debit card for payment, he went upfront in requesting them.
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
Answer:
The conflict theorist would argue from the point of view of the society being in perpetual competition as a result of inequality of distribution of resources and power. The rich would not pave the way for cheaper technology as a result of them purchasing early version of expensive technologies but rather, everyone would aspire to be the first to buy such early version of technology due to prestige associated with it.
On the long run, the conflict theorists makes more sense due to the fact that, as more people aspire to buy the early version of technologies, it creates extraordinary demand for the goods. this would force the manufacturers to employ more workers inorder to meet up with the demand thereby leading to fall in the prices of such goods. An example is the Toyota brand cars that is popular in some countries.
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Dr. Parrett is a sports psychologist for a large Southern university. The provost and chancellor have asked him to examine the relationship between athletic performance and academic stress at the university. For example, is it the case that the most talented athletes experience the greatest concern over their grades? The provost and chancellor have made it clear to Dr. Parrett that they want a large amount of external validity in the study. He has valid and reliable measures of both athletic performance and academic stress. He knows that he does not have the time or the money to study the entire population of interest.
Imagine that Dr. Parrett wants to use a nonrepresentative sampling technique. Name the three types of nonprobability sampling and explain how each one could be used by Dr. Parrett."
Answer:
The four types of nonprobability sampling are convenience sampling, purposive sampling, quota sampling, and snowball sampling.
Explanation:
Convenience sampling: Allows a selection to be made of a small sample of the target population of the research. This sample is made up of individuals who are available and accessible to research and not through statistical criteria. Regarding the question above, Dr. Parrett can select the athletes he knows and who would like to participate in the research.
Purposive sampling: It allows the sample to be controlled whenever a certain manipulation is possible to generate expected and known results. In the case of the question above, Dr Parrett can search for specific athletes, with characteristics that will generate an expected result in the research.
Snowball sampling: Allows the individuals who make up the sample to invite other individuals to compose the sample, who in turn can invite other individuals. In the case of the question above, Dr. Parret can invite the athletes he wants and ask them to call friends to participate in the survey as well.
Sampling quota: Allows the individuals who will compose the sample to be selected due to their characteristics and qualities. Regarding the question above, Dr. Parrett could only summon athletes with high marks.
Answer:
avoidance learning
Explanation:
According to my research on operant conditioning, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this scenario exemplifies avoidance learning. This term refers to the process in which an individual adapts a specific behavior or action in order to avoid a certain stressor or negative situation. This is the case in this scenario as the student decided to study a lot harder (specific behavior) in order to avoid the negative outcomes of bad grades in the future (negative situation).
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
