Answer:
This is the sample answer
Explanation:
After a natural disaster, such as a major hurricane, there is increased demand for gasoline, lumber, bottled water, clothing, and other essential goods as people try to replace and rebuild what was lost. At the same time, the supply of these goods likely decreases because of disruptions to factories and transportation. Under normal market conditions, producers would raise their prices at the first sign of trouble, both to offset their own losses from the disaster and to obtain optimal profits.
However, people who have lost everything need to start rebuilding as soon as possible at a price they can afford to pay. The sooner the community is rebuilt and back to normal, the sooner the local economy will return to normal for both consumers and producers. For this reason, I think the government should introduce price ceilings on essential goods during a disaster. Many people would not be able to buy the goods they need without price ceilings. Although producers lose out on maximizing their profits, their actual losses are limited because they are allowed to raise prices to cover production and transportation costs driven up by the disaster.
Because citizens benefit so greatly from them, I think emergency price ceilings are beneficial to the economy as long as producers do not suffer significant losses from them.
Answer:
Periodic payment = $3,881.88 (Approx).
Explanation:
Given:
Present value of annuity = $36,500
Rate = 6.5% = 0.065
Number of payment = 15
Computation:
![Present\ value\ of\ annuity = periodic\ payment[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n}}{r} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Present%5C%20value%5C%20of%5C%20annuity%20%3D%20periodic%5C%20payment%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D)
![36,500 = periodic\ payment[\frac{1-(1+0.065)^{-15}}{0.065} ]\\\\36,500 = periodic\ payment[\frac{1-(1.065)^{-15}}{0.065} ]\\\\36,500 = periodic\ payment[\frac{1-0.388826524}{0.065} ]\\\\36,500 = periodic\ payment[\frac{0.611173476}{0.065} ]\\\\36,500 = periodic\ payment[9.40266886 ]\\\\periodic\ payment = 3,881.87658](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=36%2C500%20%3D%20periodic%5C%20payment%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.065%29%5E%7B-15%7D%7D%7B0.065%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C36%2C500%20%3D%20periodic%5C%20payment%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281.065%29%5E%7B-15%7D%7D%7B0.065%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C36%2C500%20%3D%20periodic%5C%20payment%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-0.388826524%7D%7B0.065%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C36%2C500%20%3D%20periodic%5C%20payment%5B%5Cfrac%7B0.611173476%7D%7B0.065%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C36%2C500%20%3D%20periodic%5C%20payment%5B9.40266886%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5Cperiodic%5C%20payment%20%3D%203%2C881.87658)
Periodic payment = $3,881.88 (Approx).
Answer:
The answer is E.
Explanation:
Total payment from customers is:
$537,400 + $737,500
= $1,274,900
Weighted average delay from customer A is:
($537,400/$1,274,900) x 3
=1.26 days
Weighted average delay from customer B is:
($737,500/$1,274,900) x 1
=0.58 day
Therefore, total weighted average delay is:
1.26 days + 0.58 day
=1.84days
<span>The best advice to be given to Ms. Lee in regards to the
scenario is that she has the eligibility for a SEP in which she could enrolled
in before she could even move to the location where she would likely be
residing to. With this plan, if she notified about moving earlier or in
advance, the period will only last for about two months in addition.</span>
Answer:
d. Over time
Explanation:
The interest revenue will be recognize over time, regardless of the payment
If we only recognize revenue at payment due, if the bank client doesn't paid then we cannot recognize the accrued interest receivable.
We will recognize over time.
