Answer:
(1). y = x ~ Exp (1/3).
(2). Check attachment.
(3). EY = 3(1 - e^-2).
(4). Var[y] = 3(1 - e^-2) (1 -3 (1 - e^-2)) - 36e^-2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kindly check the attachment to aid in understanding the solution to the question.
So, from the question, we given the following parameters or information or data;
(A). The probability in which attempt to establish a video call via some social media app may fail with = 0.1.
(B). " If connection is established and if no connection failure occurs thereafter, then the duration of a typical video call in minutes is an exponential random variable X with E[X] = 3. "
(C). "due to an unfortunate bug in the app all calls are disconnected after 6 minutes. Let random variable Y denote the overall call duration (i.e., Y = 0 in case of failure to connect, Y = 6 when a call gets disconnected due to the bug, and Y = X otherwise.)."
(1). Hence, for FY(y) = y = x ~ Exp (1/3) for the condition that zero is equal to y = x < 6.
(2). Check attachment.
(3). EY = 3(1 - e^-2).
(4). Var[y] = 3(1 - e^-2) (1 -3 (1 - e^-2)) - 36e^-2.
The condition to follow in order to solve this question is that y = 0 if x ≤ 0, y = x if 0 ≤ x ≤ 6 and y = 6 if x ≥ 6.
Answer:
0x2+9x-3x-27 6x-27
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct answer is d15
Answer:
2 x minus y = negative 6 and 3 x minus y = negative 5
Step-by-step explanation:
y = 2(x+3) = 2x + 6 or 2x - y = -6
y = 5 + 3x or 3x - y = -5
When you think about it. It's actually quite easy.
The number are the amount of miles, and the variables are the amount of hours. So we would just have to multiply them. So, by putting the number together we would be able to multiply them once we have the numbers for the variables. Since we dont have them, we can just make the inequality. It says that car 1 traveled at LEAST that of car 2. Showing that car 1 may have traveled farther. SOOOOO........ the inequality should look like this:
165x <span>≥ 175y</span>