Answer:
Since it is the supreme Court that has given this decision, there is nothing much an individual congressman can do alone or even a president.
However, since anti trust laws do not cover those which are not trade or Commerce in nature, a congressman can propose to inact new laws that cover Sports related economic activities. Or they can pass a new law to include the sports related financials in the anti trust laws. But this could change the structure and the purpose of anti trust laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Explanation:
The unit profit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit - Fixed cost per unit
Unit Profit of product A = $21 - $11 - $5 = $5
Unit Profit of product B = $12 - $7 - $3 = $2
Unit Profit of product C = $32 - $18 - $9 = $5
The profit of each product in 1 machine hour = 1 hour/ Machine hours per unit * Unit Profit
Profit of Product A in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2 * $5 = $25
Profit of Product B in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.5*$2 = $4
Profit of Product C in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2* $5 = $25
Product A & Product C have same profit in 1 hour machine, then we have to consider Direct labor hours per unit which product A is 0.4 while product C is 0.7. It means Product C is more costly in direct labour than Product A.
In short, then the ranking of the products from the most profitable to the least profitable use of the constrained resource is Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Answer:
Demand Increase = Supply Increase : No change in price, quantity increases
Demand Increase > Supply Increase: Price increase, quantity increase
Demand Increase < Supply Increase : Price decrease, quantity increase
Explanation:
Markets are at equilibrium where market demand = market supply. And, upward sloping supply curve intersects with downward sloping demand curve.
If both demand & supply of dog treats increase, the effect on change in price & quantity will depend on their relative magnitude
- If increase in demand = Increase in Supply : Both the curves shift equivalently rightwards. At new equilibrium - there is no change in price, as demand increase is fulfilled by supply increase. The equilibrium quantity increases
- If increase in demand > Increase in Supply : Demand curve shifts more rightwards than supply curve. This creates excess demand & competition among buyers increase the new equilibrium price. The equilibrium quantity also increases.
- If increase in demand < Increase in Supply : Supply curve shifts more rightwards than demand curve. This creates excess supply & competition among sellers reduce the new equilibrium price. The new equilibrium quantity increases.
Answer:
Assuming Simon’s AGI is $40,000.
Gambling losses are only deductible to the extent of gambling winnings. Thus,Simon cannot deduct any of the $4,300 gambling losses. The $3,160 transportation expenses are also nondeductible as they are deemed to be personal expenses. The $2,650 broker management fees are deductible as investment fees (miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% AGI floor), and the $1,030 tax return fees are also deductible as miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% AGI floor.
Thus, $2,650 + $1,030 – (2% x $40,000 AGI) = $2,880 deduction
Answer:
a. $125 U
Explanation:
The computation of the spending variance is shown below:
= Flexible cost - actual cost
where,
Flexible cost = 2,500 manicures × $0.75 = $1,875
And, the actual cost is $2,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $1,875 - $2,000
= $125 U
It shows a difference between the actual cost and the flexible cost. Since the flexible cost is less than the actual cost so, it is unfavorable otherwise it would be favorable