Answer:
(1, 2, 3, 4) matches (A, C, B, D)
Step-by-step explanation:
The additive inverse of a term is formed by changing the sign. The additive inverse of the polynomial is formed by changing the sign of every term.
If we call the expressions on the left (top-to-bottom) 1, 2, 3, 4, and those on the right A, B, C, D, then the match-up <em>in this presentation of the question</em> is ...
1 - A
2 - C
3 - B
4 - D
_____
YMMV if the expressions are mixed differently
A
(-2c-3d) (- 11) (- 2c-3d) (- 11) left parenthesis, minus, 2, c, minus, 3, d, right parenthesis, left parenthesis, minus, 11, right parenthesis
C
(66c + 99d) \ cdot \ dfrac {1} {3} (66c + 99d) ⋅ 3
1 left parenthesis, 66, c, plus, 99, d, right parenthesis, dot, start fraction, 1, divided by, 3, end fraction
<span> E
11\cdot(2c+3d)11⋅(2c+3d)11, dot, left parenthesis, 2, c, plus, 3, d, right parenthesis
</span> answer
(-2c-3d) (- 11) = 22c + 33d
(66c + 99d) * 1/3 = 22c + 33d
11 * ( 2c+3d) = 22c + 33d
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
She'll make a total of 0.20 cents more so she'll make 6.45 per hour
thank you
And may I please be rewarded with brainliest I only need one more to go up in ranking
Answer:
I believe the answer is A
Step-by-step explanation:
The four options are attached below
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>Second attachment is the correct choice
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>ASA (angle-side-angle) means that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle
<u>Now, let's check the choices:</u><u>First attachment:</u>
It shows that two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second one. This is congruency by SAS. Therefore, this option is
incorrect<u>Second attachment:</u>
It shows that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle. This is congruency by ASA. Therefore, this option is
correct<u>Third attachment:</u>
It shows that the three angles in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three angles in the second one. This is not enough to prove congruency. Therefore, this option is
incorrect<u>Fourth attachment:</u>
It shows that the three sides in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second one. This is congruency by SSS. Therefore, this option is
incorrect.
Based on the above, the second attachment is the only correct one
Hope this helps :)