All categories

1 year ago

Which of these is an acceptable less hazardous method of cleaning than solvents?

Business

1 answer:

Olin [163]1 year ago

3 0

Answer:

I guess that this depends on what you want to clean, but my choice is

using a dishwasher

E.g. if you are a mechanic and you need to clean auto parts (which are dirty and greasy), then a hot soap washer is very useful. A hot soap washer is basically a dishwasher that works with hot pressurized water. Generally, detergent is much less hazardous than solvents. This method applies to all the objects that can be moved into the sink in order to be washed.

If you want to clean things at home, the same applies. The least hazardous cleaning method is using hot water and detergent.

A pressurized water hose may be a solution to certain issues, e.g. clean bird poop on top of a car or a sidewalk. If you can mechanically clean something (use a broom or vacuum cleaner), then there is no reason why you would need a solvent. Using disposable wipes only increases the amount of waste that you generate.

You might be interested in

Kohl Co, provides warranties for many of its products. The January 1, 2019, balance of the Estimated Warranty Liability account

Brums [2.3K]

Answer and Explanation:

The computation is shown below;

a. For Warranty Expense

= Sales × Estimated Warranty Percentage%

= $4,144,400 × 0.87%%

= $36,056.28

The amount that should be reported is

Opening Balance of Estimated Warranty Liability Jan. 1, 2019 $42,635

Less: Actual warranty costs in 2019 ($26,750)

Add: Warranty expense accrued in 2019 $35,056

Closing Balance of Estimated Warranty Liability Dec. 31, 2019 $50,941

8 0

2 years ago

Poor internal compliance with supply processes may indicate that internal customers do not trust the supply process or the suppl

bagirrra123 [75]

That statement is True

Internal Compliance is carried out to ensure that all process are done according to regulated rules and standard

Poor internal compliance could indicate that certain process is not carried out according to standard, which could damage the trust of internal customers

3 0

2 years ago

According to John Kotter, which of the following actions will adversely influence refreezing efforts?A) the absence of a visionB

dedylja [7]

Answer:

D) declaring victory too soon

Explanation:

John Kotter in this theory of leadership explains the concept and importance of change. He basically believes that the company shall be currently functional.

By the term currently functional he means that the company shall be updated and working on with the current market trend. This means the company shall not be resistant to change and that the management shall take a note of it.

Further in the moving scenario there is no freezing point - the company shall constantly work on the new things which it can improve and excel.

Thus, final confirmation cannot be made soon as towards the change made.

6 0

1 year ago

Canada and the U.S. both produce wheat and computer software. Canada is said to have the comparative advantage in producing whea

timurjin [86]

Answer:

The correct answer is <em>d. Canada requires fewer resources than the U.S. to produce a bushel of wheat.</em>

Explanation:

A country (in this case Canada) has a comparative advantage over another country (in this case the United States) to produce a certain product (in this case wheat) if the production costs of that product (wheat) are less than from the other country, regardless of the opportunity cost of producing that other product in that country.

The comparative advantage is based on the fact that the country has developed greater efficiency in the use of resources or that it has greater ease of access to them due to better conditions of nature, greater technological development in the field in question, human capital more specialized in that economic field, etc.

The opportunity cost of producing a product or another in the same country does not affect a deterioration or increase of the comparative advantage developed to produce such a product.

6 0

2 years ago

Last year if 97 percent of the revenues of a company came from domestic sources and the remaining revenues, totaling $450,000, c

serg [7]

If 97% came from domestic sources then 3% came from foreign sources. This means that $450,000 is 3/100 of the total amount. You need to divide 450,000 by 3 to get 1/100 (1%) of the total amount, then multiply that number by 100 to give you the sum of 100/100 (100%) of the company's revenues:
450,000/3=150,000×100= $15,000,000
So, the company made $15,000,000 last year

7 0

1 year ago