Answer:
C. Different sample proportions would result each time, but for either sample size, they would be centered (have their mean) at the true population proportion.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information;
A political polling agency wants to take a random sample of registered voters and ask whether or not they will vote for a certain candidate.
A random sample is usually an outcome of any experiment that cannot be predicted before the result.
SO;
One plan is to select 400 voters, another plan is to select 1,600 voters
If the study were conducted repeatedly (selecting different samples of people each time);
Different sample proportions would result each time, but for either sample size, they would be centered (have their mean) at the true population proportion. This is because a sample proportion deals with random experiments that cannot be predicted in advance and they are quite known to be centered about the population proportion.
Answer:
Option c. 18 withdrawals is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Gareth has to invest = $2,000
His local bank gives 2.2% annual interest and gives him the ability to make ATM withdrawals without any charges.
In an online savings gives 4.85% annual interest, but charges $3 every time he makes an ATM withdrawal.
Let us find the amount of interest earned from the local bank.
The amount of interest earned from Local Bank = 2.2% of 2000
=
× 2000
= 0.022 × 2000 = $44
The amount of interest earned from online savings = 4.85% of 2000
=
× 2000
= 0.0485 × 2000 = $97
As it is given that savings account has no ATM withdrawal charges but online savings account charge $3.00 per withdrawal.
so we need to make x withdrawals from both accounts such that:
97 - 3x = 44
Let us solve for x.
Upon subtracting 97 from both sides of or equation we will get,
97 - 97 - 3x = 44 - 97
3x = -53

x = 17.666 rounded to 18
Therefore, Gareth must make 18 ATM withdrawals every year for the local savings account to be a better deal than the online savings account.
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation: i'm not explaining why
Answer:
21 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the equation
where x is the number of years passed.
Once you've solved for it, x=20.475319. Although it's closer to 20 years to the nearest year, it's 21 years since you'll wont reach 3000 in year 20.