Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
AU 240 consolidates the fraud triangle of opportunity, pressure/incentives and rationalization in organizing prevention. Opportunity is the demonstration being conceivable or moderately simple including access to submit the extortion. Pressure can be either a person's requirement for cash or rewards and disciplines connected to the representative by the firm; saw need to meet money related experts' profit desires; and want for higher reward and upgraded of investment opportunity esteem. Rationalization is creating reasons to legitimize accomplishing something for the most part wrong with the goal that one doesn't feel excessively blame, for example, it will just happen this one time.
We have a popular social networking website trying to employ changes to its platform. In order to gauge the response of the target audience, answer is E. where the release should be given to a small number of random members of target audience to minimize risk of loosing other audience.
Ego integrity VS despair.
As we grow older (65+ yrs) and become senior citizens, we tend to slow down our productivity and explore life as a retired person. It is during this time that we contemplate our accomplishments and can develop integrity if we see ourselves as leading a successful life. Erik Erikson believed if we see our lives as unproductive, feel guilt about our past, or feel that we did not accomplish our life goals, we become dissatisfied with life and develop despair, often leading to depression and hopelessness.
The following concept is central both to the Declaration of Independence and to Social Contract Theory:
C) the authority of the government should be derived from the consent of the governed
This is described as the people give the government their consent (or okay) to be governed.
