The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In this question, what is asked is to compare the plagiarism of the student version compared to this original version form the author.
The original version is the one that appears in this question. The version of the student is the following:
"Teachers don't often provide feedback anonymously, but the ability to provide feedback anonymously may create a context where the rationale associated with specific suggestions can be more safely explored (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010). However, we cannot assume that all anonymous online spaces will serve as safe social spaces."
We have three options in this question: A) word-for-word plagiarism. B) paraphrasing plagiarism. C) this is no plagiarism. So, by the way, the student's answer was written, we can assume that there is no plagiarism.
Answer:
sociology quiz In order to better understand the sorority pledging process at her university for her sociology thesis, Carmen pledges with a popular sorority. This is an example of <u>participant observation</u>.ermine whether their subjects are in the upper class or the upper-middle class
Explanation:
Participant observation is the observation and participation in a group's activities-in its natural setting. It is also known as ethnography, field studies, and/or the vestehen approach.
It is based on grounded theory approach, an approach that develops a theory as data is collected as opposed to being predetermined.
A few examples of those who use participant observation includes : researchers, journalists, and law enforcement.
As in the given scenario, this is an example of <u>participant observation</u>
Answer:Divergent thinking
Explanation: Divergent thinking is often referred to as creative thinking and is defined as “may follow many lines of thought”
I find that chocolate boosts my mood after testing. Its scientifically proven that chocolate makes a person happier. Ever the smell of chocolate brings joy to people!
<span>A concrete operational thinker replaces intuitive reasoning with logical reasoning. Reasoning will be based on observable quantities and qualities, not the hypothetical. As and example , a concrete thinker would know that changing the shape of a lump of clay does not change how MUCH there is of the clay, as they can observer the clay.</span>
