Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
a random & coincidental occurrence
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Oleg's predictive accuracy can be attributed as being a random & coincidental occurrence. This is mainly due to the fact that making this prediction correctly 7 times in a row has extremely low odds of happening and those odds keep getting worse the more times he tosses the coin.
Answer:
Why humans left their African homeland 80000 years ago to colonize the world. When the migration was complete, Homo sapiens was the last—and When the study of human origins intensified in the 20th century, two main theories emerged to explain the archaeological explanation. Blombos Cave held signs of early human creativity. The currently favored theory is that humans migrated via the Bering land bridge along the western Pacific coastline at a time when sea levels were lower, exposing an ice-free coastline for travel with the possibility for transport over water. Ancient scroll from SAPIENS. In a study published today in Nature, researchers report that dramatic climate fluctuations created favorable environmental conditions that triggered periodic waves of human migration out of Africa every 20,000 years or so, beginning just over 100,000 years ago.
Explanation:
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
Talk to get information. In my opinion this is not a good tool. Listening is better than talk.
I believe the answer is: <span>uncertainty avoidance
</span><span>uncertainty avoidance refers to an effort that made by individuals to tolerate a certain amount of ambiguity in order to cope with their anxiety.
</span>This could often be spotted in superstition believers, because people like to attributing uncertain situation on the mercy of higher being in order not to held accountable for the outcome.
