. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Answer:
$3.15 is the orignal price
Step-by-step explanation:
the chance of a positive response for Program 2 given that the individual is from Los Angeles is 69.7.
so tell me if i helped
Answer:
The probability that Jones is lying is 6/7
Step-by-step explanation:
First we will list out 2 different cases when the outcome is a lie
1.probability that Jones tells lies is = 0.6 and probability that dalgiliesh analyses it correctly is 0.8
So the probability that dagliesh correctly analyses that he is telling lies is 0.8*0.6=0.48
2.Probability that Jones tells truth is 0.4 and if dagliesh analyses it incorrectly (which has a probability of 0.2) the outcome(as analysed by dagiliesh) is a lie
So probability that dagliesh analyses Jones truth as a lie is 0.2*.0.4=0.08
Total probability of outcome being a lie is 0.48+0.08=0.56
But we need the probability of Jones actually saying a lie which is nothing but 0.48/0.56= 6/7
Given that the 35% of area has been developed, the percentage of land that has not been developed is:
100-35
=65%
hence the acres of land that are to be developed will be:
35/65*500
=269.23 acres
the answer is 269.23
