Answer:
Legitimate promissory notes are marketed to sophisticated, corporate investors that have the ability to thoroughly research the company issuing the notes and determine whether the issuer will be able to repay principal and interest. There have been many instances of "promissory note fraud" where unlicensed individuals push bogus promissory notes that are sold as investments that offer above-market fixed interest rates and safeguarding of principal - and most of there are frauds. This is a major concern to state regulators.
To offer a promissory note, both the salesperson and the note must be registered in the state. Only promisory notes that have maturities of 9 months or less, that are investment grade, and are sold in minimum increments of $50,000 are exempt from registration.
Finally, the tell-tale sign of fraud are:
Statements that tho notes are "guaranteed" or insured, especially by bogus foreign entities.
Promises of above-market rates fo return
Statements that the notes are "risk"free"
The labeling of a star-up company´s notes as prime
Offers of promissory notes from a stanger who does not know the costumer financial situation
Well it raises the price of goods such as a juice bottle costing 3.00 dollars and adding a 4% increase to that price. also another aim is better jobs for people, making sure that everyone can find a job
Answer:
From the given Matrix we can see that if videotech is selecting a high price, movietonia has a higher profit when it is charging a low price and this profit is 18. Similarly when videotech is selecting a lower price movietonia again has a higher profit when it is selecting a lower price which is 10. This indicates that movie tonia has a dominant strategy of selecting a low price.
If movietonia is selecting a high price videotech has a a higher pay off of 18 when it is selecting a low price. In case movietonia is selecting a low price videotech again has a higher profit when it is selecting a low price and this profi is 10.
Therefore videotech and movietonia both have dominant strategy of selecting a low price and this implies that low price, low price will be the Nash equilibrium.
In case the two firms are not colluding, both of them will choose a low price.
This is definitely an example of business dilemma game. The statement is true.
Explanation:
Answer:
$114,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Net credit sales = $2,250,000
Opening allowance for Doubtful Accounts = $36,000
Uncollectible accounts receivable written off = $90,000
Firstly, we need to find the excess amount to be adjusted to allowance for Doubtful Accounts. It is calculated as follows:
= Uncollectible accounts receivable written off - Opening allowance for Doubtful Accounts
= $90,000 - $36,000
= $54,000
Allowance amount:
= 10% of the balance in receivables
= 0.1 × $600,000
= $60,000
Therefore, the required adjustment to the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts at December 31, 2017 is determined by summing up the excess amount and allowance amount.
= Excess amount to be adjusted to allowance for Doubtful Accounts + Allowance amount
= $54,000 + $60,000
= $114,000
Answer:
Explanation:
A)
The regression equation is,
ln(Cell Phone Subscribers) = -820.894 + 0.411704 Year
or,
Percent of Cell Phone Subscribers = exp(--820.894 + 0.411704 Year)
For the year 2005,
Percent of Cell Phone Subscribers = exp(--820.894 + 0.411704 * 2005)
= 96.79%
B)
P-value for the significance of the slope is very low (0.000). Thus, the model is statistically significant and the prediction of the model is highly reliable.
