Answer:laboratory experimentation
Explanation:
The type of investigation that represent the descriptive method of scientific inquiry are; observation, case study and survey.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer and Explanation:
The action taken by the department of Middlebury history is right as Wikipedia is a source of information on which ordinary people contribute to the content of the posts. We may say that the fact that its sources can be used in tests or articles is not so accurate.
It must be utilized as a learning get-together apparatus just and the data one get from their ought to be affirmed from some dependable source.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The oblique illumination is
used by the microscopists to resolve N. Spencrii in the Dark Field Condensers.
Explanation:
It was found that the use of oblique light was required to resolve the striae. Oblique illumination was the first step toward dark field microscopy. In dark field, light 
seems to radiate from the specimen while all the rest of the field is black. Resolution is as good as that in bright field while contrast is enhanced.
 In dark field microscopy, no 
direct light from the condenser enters the objective lens. Only light 
that is reflected, refracted or diffracted by the specimen enters the objective. The dark field condenser produces a circle of light. The 
light is at an extremely oblique angle to the surface of the slide. This 
oblique light comes to a focus on the specimen. It then diverges so 
strongly that no direct light enters the objective. This type 
of illumination is a hollow cone of light.
 
        
             
        
        
        
A simple example is when people don't understand sarcasm. It happened once to me that i was being sarcastic and people thought that i was serious. In the end, there was a big argument because those people believed that i had been serious while i clearly believed they understood my sarcasm.
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The false statement about John B. Watson is the one that says that he worked with Edward C. Tolman to prove that fear is both an instinct and a reflex. 
Although he worked on the subject through the Little Albert Experiment, he did not work with Edward C. Tolman but with Rosalie Rayner, his assistant and later couple.
In the experiment, Watson intended to demonstrate how the principles of classical conditioning, which had just been raised by Ivan Pavlov in those years, could be applied to a child's fear reaction to a white rat.