When it comes to this context, nothing is sure to be a success, so no
Answer:
When Peter Solvik joined Cisco in January 1993 as the company's CIO, Cisco was a $500 million company running a UNIX-based software package to support its core transaction processing, including financial, manufacturing, and order entry systems. At that time, Cisco was experiencing significant growth. However, the application didn't provide the degree of redundancy, reliability, and maintainability that Cisco needed to meet the business requirements anymore. The current systems may be good for $300 million companies, but they were not suitable for a $1 billion dollar company. Solvik let each functional area make its own decision regarding the application and timing of its move, but all functional areas were required to use common architecture and databases. However, in the following years, the functional area were facing dilemma. Anything Cisco did would just run over the legacy systems. It turned into an effort to constantly band-aid the existing systems. So the systems replacement difficulties of functional areas perpetuated the deterioration of Cisco's legacy environment. System outages became routines. Finally, in January of 1994, Cisco's legacy environment failed. As a result, the company was largely shut down for two days.
Why were no managers eager to take on this project?
Because if Cisco wanted to replace the existing legacy systems, the system in each functional areas had to make change accordingly. Take manufacturing for example, if manufacturing wanted to spend $5 or $6 million dollars to buy a package and by the way it will take a year or more to get it. It was too much to justify. Therefore, none of managers was going to throw out the legacies and do something big. In a word, because implementation a new system would cost a lot of money and take long time to be realized, no one was individually going to go out and buy a package.
Explanation:
45N + 400M + 20P ≥ 45 is the constraint that limits the amount of time the writer will work each week.
Explanation:
Integer constraints limit any or all variables to only allow integer values in the optimisation issue. It allows for precise simulation of situations that include discrete numbers (such as equity shares) or decisions yes or no.
Both "limits" and "restrictions" are "restrictions," which may be the broadest word to denote anything that prohibits a entity or a mechanism from happening. "Standards" and "controls" typically feel like standing back, where "stretches" sound like being alone.
Answer:
<em><u>Any cost directly attributable to bring the asset into current location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating it, in the manner intended by the management ( Para 15) 4.1.1. Clause b</u></em>
According to this the cost must be allocated to the purchase of land.
There are three scenarios.
1) if the land with a building is purchased with the intention of demolishing an old building and building a new building then selling it all the costs would be assigned to the purchase of land.
2) if the land is purchased with the building on it and that building is used for a short time and then demolished then the building demolish charges would be expense out.
3)if the land with a building is purchased with the intention of demolishing an old building and building a new building then using it then two different costs accounts of land and building would be used. We would not demolish the old building without the new building being made so the demolish would be added in the incremental costs of the new building.
The given question is of the third scenario therefore
Costs of Land = $ 181,000 + $ 15,600 + $ 1400 + 2600= $ 200,600
Incremental Cost of new building = $ 1600
Answer:
The amount to be paid is $100,440
Explanation:
When the bond matures, it is the due date on which the bond issuer need to pay off the bond on that particular date.
In this case, the bond matures in 2028, so
Interest amount = Face value of bond × Price × Interest
= $1,000 × 93 × 8%
= $7,440
The amount to be paid on maturity will be:
= $7,440 + $93,000
= $100,440
