Answer:
Of course this is a retaliatory action. Troy filed a complaint for discriminatory harassment against Cinthia and she answers back by discriminating against Troy even more. All she needed to do was stop discriminating against Troy, she wasn't supposed to increase discrimination against him. This is an example of what shouldn't happen.
Explanation:
Answer:
the essential terms of the contract.
Explanation:
Generally contracts that involve large transactions like selling a company must be made in writing and must be signed by all the parties. In this case, the sort of wrote a summary of the basic terms of the sale on the back of an invoice, and at least they signed it. As it is, the contract might not be enforceable because it probably lacks a lot of important details, since the amount of space used to write it down was very small specially considering that most of the space was used for the signatures.
So in order to prevent any future problems, and to comply with the statute of frauds, they should make a written memorandum that includes the essential and important terms of the contract, which must be signed also. They could also write down a proper sales contract since they are signing it again.
The statute of frauds establishes that certain contracts must be done in writing, and since this contract probably involves a significant amount of money, it probably falls under it.
A worker’s positive reaction to a negative performance review from an employer might be option A "ignore the criticisms made at the review." Option A seems to be the best fit for this question because option B would I consider a negative reaction because addressing the employer over the negative review could start a fight and the other two seem too irrelevant for this question.
Hope this helps.
