Question

George walks in and wants to send multiple back to back transactions to the

Answer 1

The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.

The sender i.e. Geroge who not even know the receiver that sells the homeopathy remedies online so this could raise a few issues but it is not to be considered very serious for red-flagged:

• Since e-commerce arises each and every time that lies between non-known parties online.

This is due to the dirt chape that could make it suspicious also they don't know each other so this should be considered red-flagged.

• The instructions with regard to the payment do not represent any signal of reliability and truthfulness so might me the receiver is trustworthy and genuine.
• In the case when the homeopathy remedies do not have the licensing and permissions so it would become questionable.

No one could suggest the specific brand of homeopathy as it becomes nonprofessional and non-appropriate, so the last option is not be considered.

Therefore we can conclude that The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.

Learn more about homeopathy here: brainly.com/question/7460064

Answer 2

Answer: The Sender and Receiver don't know each other

Sending money for what sounds like a too good to be true

The purpose of transaction for online goods is questionable

Explanation: