Answer:
Side of 22 and height of 11
Step-by-step explanation:
Let s be the side of the square base and h be the height of the tank. Since the tank volume is restricted to 5324 ft cubed we have the following equation:


As the thickness is already defined, we can minimize the weight by minimizing the surface area of the tank
Base area with open top 
Side area 4sh
Total surface area 
We can substitute 


To find the minimum of this function, we can take the first derivative, and set it to 0



![s = \sqrt[3]{10648} = 22](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B10648%7D%20%3D%2022)

Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that

So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Answer:
The correct answer is Graph B.
Hope this helps!!! :)
Answer:
500, or 400 if its 4
Step-by-step explanation:
She made a mistake when she subtracted x1 from x2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1 :
a)
The formula used by Lorena to calculate the slope between 2 points is correct
So the statement given in option 1 is not the reason for her mistake
Step 2:
b)
She has taken the fourth and fifth point and correctly used the x and y co ordinates to calculate the slope
Hence the statement in second option is not true
Step 3:
c)
While calculating the slope the denominator is -2 - (-4) . This gives 2 as the answer. But she has made a mistake in this subtraction giving -6 as the answer.
Hence she has made a mistake in subtracting x1 from x2 and this statement is true
Step 4:
d)
She has not made any mistake in subtracting y1 from y2. Hence this statement is not true